Ulises Blanch vs Jenson Brooksby — Indian Wells CH Round of 64

Indian Wells CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 February 2019
hard
Jenson Brooksby
USA
Jenson Brooksby
#76ATP
1694ELO
1682Hard ELO
$530kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLLL
Blanch U.
4-6 6-2 6-2
Brooksby J.
Blanch U.
4662
Brooksby J.
6221

Ulises Blanch defeated Jenson Brooksby 4-6 6-2 6-2 in the Indian Wells CH round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jenson Brooksby came in ranked #76.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blanch U.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Brooksby J.

Brooksby J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Serve advantage — Brooksby J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Blanch U.Brooksby J.
—
Serve
14
—
Return
53

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Blanch U.Brooksby J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.0
2.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanch U.Brooksby J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
19
89
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
97
Break points won·Dominant
2
78
Deciding sets·Dominant
19
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Blanch U.Brooksby J.
Freshness·
—
92

Brooksby J.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Edmund K.[1]
Rublev A.[7]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Harris L.[5]
6-24-66-1
Rublev A.[7]
Evans D.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Maden Y.[8]
3-66-06-3
Evans D.
Jung J.[14]
6-46-4
Rublev A.[7]
Bolt A.[13]
6-46-3
Harris L.[5]
Caruso S.
7-646-3
R16
Evans D.
Giraldo S.
6-16-2
Harris L.[5]
Young D.
6-46-2
Maden Y.[8]
Majchrzak K.
6-27-5
Jung J.[14]
Krajinovic F.[2]
7-56-3
Bolt A.[13]
Donskoy E.[4]
6-33-67-5
Rublev A.[7]
Polansky P.[11]
6-27-5
Caruso S.
Redlicki M.
7-682-67-61
Edmund K.[1]
Rosol L.[16]
6-36-4
R32
Giraldo S.
Donaldson J.[9]
6-22-66-4
Rosol L.[16]
Watanuki Y.
7-657-66
Edmund K.[1]
Robredo T.
6-46-4
Redlicki M.
Blanch U.
6-33-66-1
Krajinovic F.[2]
Aragone J.
6-23-67-5
Jung J.[14]
Krueger M.
6-16-4
Evans D.
Istomin D.[6]
6-46-4
Donskoy E.[4]
Zopp J.
6-37-63
Bolt A.[13]
Krstin P.
6-36-4
Polansky P.[11]
Harrison C.
6-43-67-64
Rublev A.[7]
Smith J.
6-27-5
Harris L.[5]
Eubanks C.
7-656-746-0
Young D.
Laaksonen H.[10]
7-53-66-4
Caruso S.
Lacko L.[15]
4-66-36-1
Maden Y.[8]
Escobedo E.
7-636-3
Majchrzak K.
Kecmanovic M.[12]
6-26-3
R64
Krueger M.
Milojevic N.
7-56-4
Giraldo S.
Novikov D.
7-55-76-2
Evans D.
Cressy M.
6-47-5
Zopp J.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.
Giron M.
7-56-3
Aragone J.
Nakashima B.
6-16-4
Krstin P.
Bemelmans R.
6-36-4
Harrison C.
Smyczek T.
6-44-66-3
Smith J.
Rubin N.
6-726-36-4
Young D.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-17-64
Caruso S.
Quiroz R.
7-56-2
Blanch U.
Brooksby J.
4-66-26-2
Escobedo E.
Redlicki M.
6-37-63
Majchrzak K.
King D.
6-46-3
Watanuki Y.
Khan Z.
3-66-26-2
Robredo T.
Koepfer D.
4-67-56-2