Gregoire Barrere vs Mikael Ymer — Pau CH Round of 16

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
FRA1
Gregoire Barrere
#1288ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 February 2019
hard
SWE13
Mikael Ymer
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLL
Barrere G.
6-3 6-3
Ymer M.
Barrere G.
662
Ymer M.
330

Gregoire Barrere defeated Mikael Ymer 6-3 6-3 in the Pau CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Mikael Ymer came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Gregoire Barrere claimed a first win over Mikael Ymer in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-09-19MetzR16hardMikael Ymer6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Barrere G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ymer M.

Ymer M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Barrere G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Barrere G.Ymer M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Barrere G.Ymer M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
50
71
Break points saved·Even
92
90
Break points won·Dominant
18
71
Deciding sets·Slight edge
84
94
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
20
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bublik A.[4]
Gombos N.
5-76-36-3
Semi-finals
Gombos N.
Darcis S.
6-42-0
Bublik A.[4]
Barrere G.[1]
7-667-5
Quarter-finals
Barrere G.[1]
Safiullin R.
6-16-2
Darcis S.
Halys Q.[5]
6-46-4
Gombos N.
Ofner S.[7]
6-37-65
Bublik A.[4]
Janvier M.
6-17-5
R16
Halys Q.[5]
Kamke T.[12]
7-657-63
Bublik A.[4]
Choinski J.
6-46-2
Darcis S.
Bourgue M.
3-67-57-65
Gombos N.
Kolar Z.
6-757-646-3
Ofner S.[7]
Lamasine T.
6-746-37-5
Janvier M.
Miedler L.
7-626-4
Safiullin R.
Kuhn N.
6-36-4
Barrere G.[1]
Ymer M.[13]
6-36-3
R32
Kuhn N.
Brands D.[6]
6-17-65
Janvier M.
Clarke J.[11]
6-22-0
Safiullin R.
Horansky F.[9]
7-657-63
Ymer M.[13]
Torpegaard M.
1-66-26-4
Bourgue M.
Bolelli S.[2]
7-57-65
Kolar Z.
Griekspoor T.[16]
6-727-56-3
Halys Q.[5]
Vavassori A.
6-36-2
Bublik A.[4]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-4
Darcis S.
De Greef A.[14]
7-657-5
Kamke T.[12]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-26-3
Gombos N.
Stakhovsky S.[3]
7-644-66-1
Lamasine T.
Napolitano S.[10]
6-17-5
Ofner S.[7]
Grigelis L.
7-656-4
Miedler L.
Giustino L.[8]
4-67-686-4
Choinski J.
Pavlasek A.[15]
6-47-5
Barrere G.[1]
Serdarusic N.
7-54-66-3
R64
Darcis S.
Muller A.
6-17-63
Vavassori A.
Bonzi B.
6-37-5
Choinski J.
Gutierrez Ferrol S.
7-52-66-3
Kolar Z.
Jacq G.
6-46-4
Kuhn N.
Brancaccio R.
6-34-66-1
Bourgue M.
Masur D.
6-16-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Heller P.
6-36-3
Gombos N.
Mitjana L.
6-46-1
Lamasine T.
Furness E.
6-27-5
Grigelis L.
Taberner C.
6-44-66-3
Miedler L.
Ilkel C.
6-46-3
Janvier M.
Karlovskiy E.
7-626-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Benchetrit E.
6-12-66-3
Safiullin R.
Brown D.
3-67-646-2
Torpegaard M.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-3
Serdarusic N.
Viola M.
6-36-4