Gregoire Barrere vs Roman Safiullin — Pau CH Quarter-final

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
FRA1
Gregoire Barrere
#1288ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 February 2019
hard
Roman Safiullin
RUS
Roman Safiullin
#96ATP
1750ELO
1704Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$4.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
Barrere G.
6-1 6-2
Safiullin R.
Barrere G.
662
Safiullin R.
120

Gregoire Barrere defeated Roman Safiullin 6-1 6-2 in the Pau CH quarter-final on hard. Gregoire Barrere extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-03-20Miami MastersR128hardGregoire Barrere6-4 3-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Barrere G.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Safiullin R.

Safiullin R.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Barrere G.

Serve advantage — Safiullin R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Barrere G.Safiullin R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
6.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Barrere G.Safiullin R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
50
68
Break points saved·Even
92
96
Break points won·Dominant
18
44
Deciding sets·Slight edge
84
76
Tiebreaks·Dominant
20
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Barrere G.Safiullin R.
Freshness·
—
84

Safiullin R.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bublik A.[4]
Gombos N.
5-76-36-3
Semi-finals
Gombos N.
Darcis S.
6-42-0
Bublik A.[4]
Barrere G.[1]
7-667-5
Quarter-finals
Barrere G.[1]
Safiullin R.
6-16-2
Darcis S.
Halys Q.[5]
6-46-4
Gombos N.
Ofner S.[7]
6-37-65
Bublik A.[4]
Janvier M.
6-17-5
R16
Halys Q.[5]
Kamke T.[12]
7-657-63
Bublik A.[4]
Choinski J.
6-46-2
Darcis S.
Bourgue M.
3-67-57-65
Gombos N.
Kolar Z.
6-757-646-3
Ofner S.[7]
Lamasine T.
6-746-37-5
Janvier M.
Miedler L.
7-626-4
Safiullin R.
Kuhn N.
6-36-4
Barrere G.[1]
Ymer M.[13]
6-36-3
R32
Kuhn N.
Brands D.[6]
6-17-65
Janvier M.
Clarke J.[11]
6-22-0
Safiullin R.
Horansky F.[9]
7-657-63
Ymer M.[13]
Torpegaard M.
1-66-26-4
Bourgue M.
Bolelli S.[2]
7-57-65
Kolar Z.
Griekspoor T.[16]
6-727-56-3
Halys Q.[5]
Vavassori A.
6-36-2
Bublik A.[4]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-4
Darcis S.
De Greef A.[14]
7-657-5
Kamke T.[12]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-26-3
Gombos N.
Stakhovsky S.[3]
7-644-66-1
Lamasine T.
Napolitano S.[10]
6-17-5
Ofner S.[7]
Grigelis L.
7-656-4
Miedler L.
Giustino L.[8]
4-67-686-4
Choinski J.
Pavlasek A.[15]
6-47-5
Barrere G.[1]
Serdarusic N.
7-54-66-3
R64
Darcis S.
Muller A.
6-17-63
Vavassori A.
Bonzi B.
6-37-5
Choinski J.
Gutierrez Ferrol S.
7-52-66-3
Kolar Z.
Jacq G.
6-46-4
Kuhn N.
Brancaccio R.
6-34-66-1
Bourgue M.
Masur D.
6-16-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Heller P.
6-36-3
Gombos N.
Mitjana L.
6-46-1
Lamasine T.
Furness E.
6-27-5
Grigelis L.
Taberner C.
6-44-66-3
Miedler L.
Ilkel C.
6-46-3
Janvier M.
Karlovskiy E.
7-626-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Benchetrit E.
6-12-66-3
Safiullin R.
Brown D.
3-67-646-2
Torpegaard M.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-3
Serdarusic N.
Viola M.
6-36-4