Lukas Rosol vs Zdenek Kolar — Cherbourg CH Round of 16

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CZE6
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 February 2019
hard
Zdenek Kolar
CZE
Zdenek Kolar
#153ATP
1506ELO
1432Hard ELO
$121kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
Rosol L.
6-3 3-6 6-0
Kolar Z.
Rosol L.
6362
Kolar Z.
3601

Lukas Rosol defeated Zdenek Kolar 6-3 3-6 6-0 in the Cherbourg CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kolar Z.

Kolar Z.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Serve advantage — Kolar Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosol L.Kolar Z.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.6
2.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosol L.Kolar Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
26
Break points saved·Dominant
89
53
Break points won·Dominant
3
28
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rosol L.Kolar Z.
Freshness·
—
90

Kolar Z.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Humbert U.[1]
Darcis S.
6-766-36-3
Semi-finals
Humbert U.[1]
Moraing M.[12]
6-736-46-2
Darcis S.
Travaglia S.[3]
6-726-36-3
Quarter-finals
Moraing M.[12]
Mahut N.[14]
W/O
Darcis S.
Rosol L.[6]
6-37-5
Travaglia S.[3]
Vanni L.[8]
3-66-36-4
Humbert U.[1]
Otte O.[9]
6-46-4
R16
Vanni L.[8]
Bonzi B.
6-43-67-64
Otte O.[9]
Quinzi G.[7]
7-636-1
Moraing M.[12]
Bolelli S.[5]
6-47-5
Humbert U.[1]
Vatutin A.[16]
6-36-4
Rosol L.[6]
Kolar Z.
6-33-66-0
Mahut N.[14]
Bemelmans R.[4]
6-36-4
Travaglia S.[3]
Crepatte B.
6-36-2
Darcis S.
Maden Y.[2]
6-43-67-65
R32
Darcis S.
De Greef A.[15]
6-10-0
Bonzi B.
Molleker R.[11]
7-627-5
Moraing M.[12]
Galovic V.
6-43-66-1
Quinzi G.[7]
Moroni G.
6-26-2
Humbert U.[1]
Benchetrit E.
7-676-1
Rosol L.[6]
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-46-2
Bemelmans R.[4]
Taberner C.
3-66-16-2
Maden Y.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-36-1
Kolar Z.
Bublik A.[10]
6-26-3
Mahut N.[14]
Muller A.
1-66-37-65
Otte O.[9]
Horansky F.
7-56-2
Vanni L.[8]
Ignatik U.
6-16-4
Crepatte B.
Gimeno Traver D.[13]
7-616-2
Travaglia S.[3]
Janvier M.
4-66-46-1
Bolelli S.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-36-3
Vatutin A.[16]
Guinard M.
6-36-2
R64
Lokoli L.
Ojeda Lara R.
4-66-26-2
Brancaccio R.
Ilkel C.
6-26-4
Darcis S.
Zapata Miralles B.
1-66-26-1
Janvier M.
Martineau M.
6-42-67-69
Crepatte B.
Wang T.
7-656-4
Bonzi B.
Bonadio R.
4-66-27-66
Ignatik U.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-3
Moroni G.
Safiullin R.
7-56-2
Horansky F.
Tabur C.
6-36-1
Guinard M.
Safranek V.
7-56-4
Galovic V.
Masur D.
6-27-5
Taberner C.
Lamasine T.
7-632-66-4
Benchetrit E.
Bourgue M.
6-36-4
Kolar Z.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-2
Muller A.
Artunedo Martinavarro A.
6-44-66-4
Cornut Chauvinc A.
Domingues J.
6-23-67-64