Filip Horansky vs Clement Tabur — Cherbourg CH Round of 64

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
SVK
Filip Horansky
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 February 2019
hard
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1573Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
Horansky F.
6-3 6-1
Tabur C.
Horansky F.
662
Tabur C.
310

Filip Horansky defeated Clement Tabur 6-3 6-1 in the Cherbourg CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Horansky F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Tabur C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Horansky F.

Serve advantage — Tabur C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Horansky F.Tabur C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Even
2.8
3.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 193). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Horansky F.Tabur C.
Clutch Rating·Even
29
32
Break points saved·Dominant
34
74
Break points won·Slight edge
33
23
Deciding sets·Clear edge
54
40
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
64
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Horansky F.Tabur C.
Freshness·
—
55

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Humbert U.[1]
Darcis S.
6-766-36-3
Semi-finals
Humbert U.[1]
Moraing M.[12]
6-736-46-2
Darcis S.
Travaglia S.[3]
6-726-36-3
Quarter-finals
Moraing M.[12]
Mahut N.[14]
W/O
Darcis S.
Rosol L.[6]
6-37-5
Travaglia S.[3]
Vanni L.[8]
3-66-36-4
Humbert U.[1]
Otte O.[9]
6-46-4
R16
Vanni L.[8]
Bonzi B.
6-43-67-64
Otte O.[9]
Quinzi G.[7]
7-636-1
Moraing M.[12]
Bolelli S.[5]
6-47-5
Humbert U.[1]
Vatutin A.[16]
6-36-4
Rosol L.[6]
Kolar Z.
6-33-66-0
Mahut N.[14]
Bemelmans R.[4]
6-36-4
Travaglia S.[3]
Crepatte B.
6-36-2
Darcis S.
Maden Y.[2]
6-43-67-65
R32
Darcis S.
De Greef A.[15]
6-10-0
Bonzi B.
Molleker R.[11]
7-627-5
Moraing M.[12]
Galovic V.
6-43-66-1
Quinzi G.[7]
Moroni G.
6-26-2
Humbert U.[1]
Benchetrit E.
7-676-1
Rosol L.[6]
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-46-2
Bemelmans R.[4]
Taberner C.
3-66-16-2
Maden Y.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-36-1
Kolar Z.
Bublik A.[10]
6-26-3
Mahut N.[14]
Muller A.
1-66-37-65
Otte O.[9]
Horansky F.
7-56-2
Vanni L.[8]
Ignatik U.
6-16-4
Crepatte B.
Gimeno Traver D.[13]
7-616-2
Travaglia S.[3]
Janvier M.
4-66-46-1
Bolelli S.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-36-3
Vatutin A.[16]
Guinard M.
6-36-2
R64
Lokoli L.
Ojeda Lara R.
4-66-26-2
Brancaccio R.
Ilkel C.
6-26-4
Darcis S.
Zapata Miralles B.
1-66-26-1
Janvier M.
Martineau M.
6-42-67-69
Crepatte B.
Wang T.
7-656-4
Bonzi B.
Bonadio R.
4-66-27-66
Ignatik U.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-3
Moroni G.
Safiullin R.
7-56-2
Horansky F.
Tabur C.
6-36-1
Guinard M.
Safranek V.
7-56-4
Galovic V.
Masur D.
6-27-5
Taberner C.
Lamasine T.
7-632-66-4
Benchetrit E.
Bourgue M.
6-36-4
Kolar Z.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-2
Muller A.
Artunedo Martinavarro A.
6-44-66-4
Cornut Chauvinc A.
Domingues J.
6-23-67-64