Ugo Humbert vs Steve Darcis — Cherbourg CH Final

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Ugo Humbert
FRA1
Ugo Humbert
#29ATP
1868ELO
1843Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 February 2019
hard
BEL
Steve Darcis
42 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
Humbert U.
6-7 6-3 6-3
Darcis S.
Humbert U.
66662
Darcis S.
78331

Ugo Humbert defeated Steve Darcis 6-7 6-3 6-3 in the Cherbourg CH final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Humbert U.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Darcis S.

Darcis S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Humbert U.Darcis S.
64
Serve
—
15
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Humbert U.Darcis S.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.8
4.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 53). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Humbert U.Darcis S.
Clutch Rating·Even
70
69
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
87
Break points won·Clear edge
37
52
Deciding sets·Even
78
79
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
91
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Humbert U.Darcis S.
Freshness·
96
—

Humbert U.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Humbert U.[1]
Darcis S.
6-766-36-3
Semi-finals
Humbert U.[1]
Moraing M.[12]
6-736-46-2
Darcis S.
Travaglia S.[3]
6-726-36-3
Quarter-finals
Moraing M.[12]
Mahut N.[14]
W/O
Darcis S.
Rosol L.[6]
6-37-5
Travaglia S.[3]
Vanni L.[8]
3-66-36-4
Humbert U.[1]
Otte O.[9]
6-46-4
R16
Vanni L.[8]
Bonzi B.
6-43-67-64
Otte O.[9]
Quinzi G.[7]
7-636-1
Moraing M.[12]
Bolelli S.[5]
6-47-5
Humbert U.[1]
Vatutin A.[16]
6-36-4
Rosol L.[6]
Kolar Z.
6-33-66-0
Mahut N.[14]
Bemelmans R.[4]
6-36-4
Travaglia S.[3]
Crepatte B.
6-36-2
Darcis S.
Maden Y.[2]
6-43-67-65
R32
Darcis S.
De Greef A.[15]
6-10-0
Bonzi B.
Molleker R.[11]
7-627-5
Moraing M.[12]
Galovic V.
6-43-66-1
Quinzi G.[7]
Moroni G.
6-26-2
Humbert U.[1]
Benchetrit E.
7-676-1
Rosol L.[6]
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-46-2
Bemelmans R.[4]
Taberner C.
3-66-16-2
Maden Y.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-36-1
Kolar Z.
Bublik A.[10]
6-26-3
Mahut N.[14]
Muller A.
1-66-37-65
Otte O.[9]
Horansky F.
7-56-2
Vanni L.[8]
Ignatik U.
6-16-4
Crepatte B.
Gimeno Traver D.[13]
7-616-2
Travaglia S.[3]
Janvier M.
4-66-46-1
Bolelli S.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-36-3
Vatutin A.[16]
Guinard M.
6-36-2
R64
Lokoli L.
Ojeda Lara R.
4-66-26-2
Brancaccio R.
Ilkel C.
6-26-4
Darcis S.
Zapata Miralles B.
1-66-26-1
Janvier M.
Martineau M.
6-42-67-69
Crepatte B.
Wang T.
7-656-4
Bonzi B.
Bonadio R.
4-66-27-66
Ignatik U.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-3
Moroni G.
Safiullin R.
7-56-2
Horansky F.
Tabur C.
6-36-1
Guinard M.
Safranek V.
7-56-4
Galovic V.
Masur D.
6-27-5
Taberner C.
Lamasine T.
7-632-66-4
Benchetrit E.
Bourgue M.
6-36-4
Kolar Z.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-2
Muller A.
Artunedo Martinavarro A.
6-44-66-4
Cornut Chauvinc A.
Domingues J.
6-23-67-64