Ernests Gulbis vs Marius Copil — Rotterdam Round of 32

Rotterdam · ATP · Round of 32
LAT
Ernests Gulbis
37 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 February 2019
hard
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Gulbis E.
6-2 6-4
Copil M.
Gulbis E.
662
Copil M.
240

Ernests Gulbis defeated Marius Copil 6-2 6-4 in the Rotterdam round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ernests Gulbis came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ernests Gulbis extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-01-04BrisbaneQ1hardErnests Gulbis6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Gulbis E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Copil M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Gulbis E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gulbis E.Copil M.
1st serve in·Even
55%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
75%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
8.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gulbis E.Copil M.
Clutch Rating·Even
48
47
Break points saved·Even
91
91
Break points won·Clear edge
17
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
6
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
7°CMainly clear
Wind 22 km/hHumidity 72%
Final
Monfils G.
Wawrinka S.
6-31-66-2
Semi-finals
Monfils G.
Medvedev D.[5]
4-66-36-4
Wawrinka S.
Nishikori K.[1]
6-24-66-4
Quarter-finals
Nishikori K.[1]
Fucsovics M.
6-36-2
Wawrinka S.
Shapovalov D.[10]
6-47-64
Medvedev D.[5]
Tsonga J.
6-46-2
Monfils G.
Dzumhur D.
6-16-2
R16
Fucsovics M.
Basilashvili N.[9]
7-616-1
Nishikori K.[1]
Gulbis E.
6-16-4
Wawrinka S.
Raonic M.[4]
6-47-64
Shapovalov D.[10]
Berdych T.
6-46-3
Monfils G.
Seppi A.
4-66-16-3
Medvedev D.[5]
Verdasco F.
6-27-5
Dzumhur D.
Kukushkin M.
6-47-63
Tsonga J.
Griekspoor T.
7-656-1
R32
Nishikori K.[1]
Herbert P.
3-66-16-4
Gulbis E.
Copil M.
6-26-4
Fucsovics M.
Klizan M.
7-646-4
Raonic M.[4]
Kohlschreiber P.
7-687-5
Wawrinka S.
Paire B.
7-646-1
Monfils G.
Goffin D.[8]
7-657-5
Kukushkin M.
Haase R.
6-27-64
Dzumhur D.
Tsitsipas S.[3]
6-41-67-5
Medvedev D.[5]
Chardy J.
7-626-2
Verdasco F.
Ebden M.
7-56-4
Griekspoor T.
Khachanov K.[2]
3-66-36-2
Tsonga J.
Fabbiano T.
6-16-4
Basilashvili N.[9]
Chung H.
4-67-616-2
Shapovalov D.[10]
Skugor F.
7-56-3
Seppi A.
Gojowczyk P.
7-633-66-2
Berdych T.
Simon G.
7-686-4