Raul Brancaccio vs Cem Ilkel — Cherbourg CH Round of 64

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Raul Brancaccio
ITA
Raul Brancaccio
#230ATP
1492ELO
1422Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 February 2019
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Brancaccio R.
6-2 6-4
Ilkel C.
Brancaccio R.
662
Ilkel C.
240

Raul Brancaccio defeated Cem Ilkel 6-2 6-4 in the Cherbourg CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brancaccio R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Brancaccio R.

Serve advantage — Brancaccio R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brancaccio R.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.5
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brancaccio R.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
11
32
Break points saved·Even
49
49
Break points won·Clear edge
19
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
9
70
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
51
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Brancaccio R.Ilkel C.
Freshness·
62
—

Brancaccio R.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 78 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Humbert U.[1]
Darcis S.
6-766-36-3
Semi-finals
Humbert U.[1]
Moraing M.[12]
6-736-46-2
Darcis S.
Travaglia S.[3]
6-726-36-3
Quarter-finals
Moraing M.[12]
Mahut N.[14]
W/O
Darcis S.
Rosol L.[6]
6-37-5
Travaglia S.[3]
Vanni L.[8]
3-66-36-4
Humbert U.[1]
Otte O.[9]
6-46-4
R16
Vanni L.[8]
Bonzi B.
6-43-67-64
Otte O.[9]
Quinzi G.[7]
7-636-1
Moraing M.[12]
Bolelli S.[5]
6-47-5
Humbert U.[1]
Vatutin A.[16]
6-36-4
Rosol L.[6]
Kolar Z.
6-33-66-0
Mahut N.[14]
Bemelmans R.[4]
6-36-4
Travaglia S.[3]
Crepatte B.
6-36-2
Darcis S.
Maden Y.[2]
6-43-67-65
R32
Darcis S.
De Greef A.[15]
6-10-0
Bonzi B.
Molleker R.[11]
7-627-5
Moraing M.[12]
Galovic V.
6-43-66-1
Quinzi G.[7]
Moroni G.
6-26-2
Humbert U.[1]
Benchetrit E.
7-676-1
Rosol L.[6]
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-46-2
Bemelmans R.[4]
Taberner C.
3-66-16-2
Maden Y.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-36-1
Kolar Z.
Bublik A.[10]
6-26-3
Mahut N.[14]
Muller A.
1-66-37-65
Otte O.[9]
Horansky F.
7-56-2
Vanni L.[8]
Ignatik U.
6-16-4
Crepatte B.
Gimeno Traver D.[13]
7-616-2
Travaglia S.[3]
Janvier M.
4-66-46-1
Bolelli S.[5]
Lokoli L.
6-36-3
Vatutin A.[16]
Guinard M.
6-36-2
R64
Lokoli L.
Ojeda Lara R.
4-66-26-2
Brancaccio R.
Ilkel C.
6-26-4
Darcis S.
Zapata Miralles B.
1-66-26-1
Janvier M.
Martineau M.
6-42-67-69
Crepatte B.
Wang T.
7-656-4
Bonzi B.
Bonadio R.
4-66-27-66
Ignatik U.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-3
Moroni G.
Safiullin R.
7-56-2
Horansky F.
Tabur C.
6-36-1
Guinard M.
Safranek V.
7-56-4
Galovic V.
Masur D.
6-27-5
Taberner C.
Lamasine T.
7-632-66-4
Benchetrit E.
Bourgue M.
6-36-4
Kolar Z.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-2
Muller A.
Artunedo Martinavarro A.
6-44-66-4
Cornut Chauvinc A.
Domingues J.
6-23-67-64