Zsombor Piros vs Michal Przysiezny — Budapest CH Round of 64

Budapest CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#169ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 February 2019
hard
POL
Michal Przysiezny
42 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Piros Z.
6-2 6-4
Przysiezny M.
Piros Z.
662
Przysiezny M.
240

Zsombor Piros defeated Michal Przysiezny 6-2 6-4 in the Budapest CH round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Przysiezny M.

Przysiezny M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Serve advantage — Piros Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Przysiezny M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
30%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.1
3.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 4). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Przysiezny M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
30
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
79
Break points won·Clear edge
32
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
38
Tiebreaks·Even
42
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Przysiezny M.
Freshness·
50
—

Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Bublik A.[8]
Marcora R.
6-06-3
Semi-finals
Marcora R.
Otte O.[6]
6-47-63
Bublik A.[8]
Horansky F.[12]
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Bublik A.[8]
Galovic V.[14]
3-66-36-4
Horansky F.[12]
Molcan A.
6-47-66
Otte O.[6]
Bourgue M.
6-36-3
Marcora R.
Kolar Z.[15]
2-66-36-2
R16
Bourgue M.
Crepatte B.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.[15]
Ignatik U.
6-45-77-5
Galovic V.[14]
Zapata Miralles B.
7-645-76-2
Bublik A.[8]
Kotov P.
6-756-26-2
Marcora R.
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Otte O.[6]
Milojevic N.[9]
6-36-4
Molcan A.
Janvier M.[13]
6-26-4
Horansky F.[12]
Baldi F.[7]
3-66-26-1
R32
Kotov P.
Coppejans K.[10]
6-42-66-3
Molcan A.
Novak D.[4]
6-23-0
Bourgue M.
Zopp J.[3]
6-36-1
Crepatte B.
Krawietz K.[16]
5-76-46-3
Kolar Z.[15]
Piros Z.
6-726-16-2
Baldi F.[7]
Muller A.
4-66-36-4
Zapata Miralles B.
Rosol L.[2]
6-37-5
Galovic V.[14]
Doumbia S.
7-656-2
Bublik A.[8]
Diez S.
6-17-5
Janvier M.[13]
Durasovic V.
7-603-66-3
Horansky F.[12]
Miedler L.
6-27-64
Otte O.[6]
Petrovic D.
7-623-67-65
Milojevic N.[9]
Griekspoor S.
6-46-716-4
Gombos N.
Griekspoor T.[11]
4-67-657-62
Ignatik U.
Ramanathan R.[1]
7-647-5
Marcora R.
Barrere G.[5]
7-626-3
R64
Zapata Miralles B.
Huesler M.
6-16-3
Miedler L.
Borsos G.
6-16-4
Muller A.
Grenier H.
6-26-4
Doumbia S.
Benchetrit E.
7-56-0
Kotov P.
Viola M.
1-66-46-3
Diez S.
Bonadio R.
6-46-2
Molcan A.
Heller P.
5-77-57-61
Durasovic V.
Serdarusic N.
6-26-2
Petrovic D.
Szintai D.
6-36-4
Griekspoor S.
Masur D.
6-23-66-4
Crepatte B.
Wang T.
6-37-5
Bourgue M.
Basso A.
6-37-60
Ignatik U.
Bega A.
6-47-5
Marcora R.
Nagy P.
6-26-1
Gombos N.
Karatsev A.
7-676-2
Piros Z.
Przysiezny M.
6-26-4