Andrea Pellegrino vs Jose Rubin Statham — Chennai CH Round of 64

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Andrea Pellegrino
ITA
Andrea Pellegrino
#138ATP
1674ELO
1422Hard ELO
$320kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 February 2019
hard
NZL
Jose Rubin Statham
39 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
Pellegrino A.
6-4 6-4
Statham J.
Pellegrino A.
662
Statham J.
440

Andrea Pellegrino defeated Jose Rubin Statham 6-4 6-4 in the Chennai CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Andrea Pellegrino edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pellegrino A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Statham J.

Statham J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Pellegrino A.

Serve advantage — Pellegrino A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pellegrino A.Statham J.
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
34%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.2
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pellegrino A.Statham J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
55
0
Break points saved·Dominant
67
33
Break points won·Dominant
35
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Pellegrino A.Statham J.
Freshness·
86
—

Pellegrino A.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 47 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Moutet C.[2]
Harris A.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Moutet C.[2]
Mukund S.[16]
3-66-46-2
Harris A.
Gunneswaran P.[1]
6-43-66-0
Quarter-finals
Moutet C.[2]
Kuhn N.[10]
5-76-36-4
Mukund S.[16]
Klein B.
6-23-67-63
Harris A.
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
1-67-666-2
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Duckworth J.[7]
6-46-3
R16
Harris A.
Mager G.[4]
7-627-62
Mukund S.[16]
Safwat M.[3]
6-36-4
Kuhn N.[10]
Lee D.[8]
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[7]
Elias G.[9]
4-67-57-5
Moutet C.[2]
Grigelis L.[14]
6-26-3
Klein B.
Kwon S.[6]
6-44-66-3
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Kadhe A.
6-46-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Myneni S.[11]
6-37-63
R32
Kuhn N.[10]
Escoffier A.
4-67-654-0
Harris A.
Yang T.[15]
6-26-1
Kadhe A.
Hernandez J.[13]
6-36-2
Kwon S.[6]
Zhurbin A.
6-16-2
Moutet C.[2]
Saville L.
6-26-716-4
Grigelis L.[14]
Ly N.
4-66-26-1
Lee D.[8]
Nagal S.
6-36-4
Mukund S.[16]
Fanselow S.
6-36-1
Klein B.
Banes M.[12]
6-46-1
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Tokuda R.
3-66-26-3
Myneni S.[11]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-46-3
Mager G.[4]
Altamirano C.
6-36-1
Duckworth J.[7]
Gakhov I.
7-627-5
Safwat M.[3]
Pellegrino A.
6-37-5
Elias G.[9]
Ellis B.
6-27-64
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Altmaier D.
6-46-4
R64
Tokuda R.
Shanmugam A.
6-36-4
Ellis B.
Vishwakarma S.
6-26-2
Gakhov I.
Kelly D.
7-666-3
Saville L.
Echargui M.
7-676-1
Ly N.
Mousley B.
6-746-16-3
Escoffier A.
Tiurnev E.
6-26-2
Nagal S.
Perez Sanz D.
6-36-2
Pellegrino A.
Statham J.
6-46-4
Klein B.
Sureshkumar M.
6-26-3
Zhurbin A.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-4
Sundar Prashanth N.
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-22-66-2
Kadhe A.
Nedelko I.
6-46-1
Altmaier D.
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Fanselow S.
Wu T.
6-47-5
Harris A.
Vukic A.
6-46-4
Altamirano C.
Uesugi K.
1-66-37-68