Sumit Nagal vs David Perez Sanz — Chennai CH Round of 64

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 February 2019
hard
ESP
David Perez Sanz
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Nagal S.
6-3 6-2
Perez Sanz D.
Nagal S.
662
Perez Sanz D.
320

Sumit Nagal defeated David Perez Sanz 6-3 6-2 in the Chennai CH round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Sumit Nagal came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Perez Sanz D.

Perez Sanz D.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Perez Sanz D.
1st serve in·Clear edge
70%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
44%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
3.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Perez Sanz D.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Moutet C.[2]
Harris A.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Moutet C.[2]
Mukund S.[16]
3-66-46-2
Harris A.
Gunneswaran P.[1]
6-43-66-0
Quarter-finals
Moutet C.[2]
Kuhn N.[10]
5-76-36-4
Mukund S.[16]
Klein B.
6-23-67-63
Harris A.
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
1-67-666-2
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Duckworth J.[7]
6-46-3
R16
Harris A.
Mager G.[4]
7-627-62
Mukund S.[16]
Safwat M.[3]
6-36-4
Kuhn N.[10]
Lee D.[8]
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[7]
Elias G.[9]
4-67-57-5
Moutet C.[2]
Grigelis L.[14]
6-26-3
Klein B.
Kwon S.[6]
6-44-66-3
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Kadhe A.
6-46-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Myneni S.[11]
6-37-63
R32
Kuhn N.[10]
Escoffier A.
4-67-654-0
Harris A.
Yang T.[15]
6-26-1
Kadhe A.
Hernandez J.[13]
6-36-2
Kwon S.[6]
Zhurbin A.
6-16-2
Moutet C.[2]
Saville L.
6-26-716-4
Grigelis L.[14]
Ly N.
4-66-26-1
Lee D.[8]
Nagal S.
6-36-4
Mukund S.[16]
Fanselow S.
6-36-1
Klein B.
Banes M.[12]
6-46-1
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Tokuda R.
3-66-26-3
Myneni S.[11]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-46-3
Mager G.[4]
Altamirano C.
6-36-1
Duckworth J.[7]
Gakhov I.
7-627-5
Safwat M.[3]
Pellegrino A.
6-37-5
Elias G.[9]
Ellis B.
6-27-64
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Altmaier D.
6-46-4
R64
Tokuda R.
Shanmugam A.
6-36-4
Ellis B.
Vishwakarma S.
6-26-2
Gakhov I.
Kelly D.
7-666-3
Saville L.
Echargui M.
7-676-1
Ly N.
Mousley B.
6-746-16-3
Escoffier A.
Tiurnev E.
6-26-2
Nagal S.
Perez Sanz D.
6-36-2
Pellegrino A.
Statham J.
6-46-4
Klein B.
Sureshkumar M.
6-26-3
Zhurbin A.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-4
Sundar Prashanth N.
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-22-66-2
Kadhe A.
Nedelko I.
6-46-1
Altmaier D.
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Fanselow S.
Wu T.
6-47-5
Harris A.
Vukic A.
6-46-4
Altamirano C.
Uesugi K.
1-66-37-68