Corentin Moutet vs Nicola Kuhn — Chennai CH Quarter-final

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Corentin Moutet
FRA2
Corentin Moutet
#40ATP
1745ELO
1727Hard ELO
$731kYTD
$6.4MCAREER
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 February 2019
hard
GER10
Nicola Kuhn
#1540ATP
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Moutet C.
5-7 6-3 6-4
Kuhn N.
Moutet C.
5662
Kuhn N.
7341

Corentin Moutet defeated Nicola Kuhn 5-7 6-3 6-4 in the Chennai CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Corentin Moutet came in ranked #40.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Moutet C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kuhn N.

Kuhn N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Moutet C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Moutet C.Kuhn N.
7
Serve
—
68
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Moutet C.Kuhn N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.7
3.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 165). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Moutet C.Kuhn N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
82
14
Break points saved·Dominant
97
56
Break points won·Dominant
75
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
10
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
78
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Moutet C.Kuhn N.
Freshness·
96
—

Moutet C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Moutet C.[2]
Harris A.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Moutet C.[2]
Mukund S.[16]
3-66-46-2
Harris A.
Gunneswaran P.[1]
6-43-66-0
Quarter-finals
Moutet C.[2]
Kuhn N.[10]
5-76-36-4
Mukund S.[16]
Klein B.
6-23-67-63
Harris A.
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
1-67-666-2
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Duckworth J.[7]
6-46-3
R16
Harris A.
Mager G.[4]
7-627-62
Mukund S.[16]
Safwat M.[3]
6-36-4
Kuhn N.[10]
Lee D.[8]
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[7]
Elias G.[9]
4-67-57-5
Moutet C.[2]
Grigelis L.[14]
6-26-3
Klein B.
Kwon S.[6]
6-44-66-3
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Kadhe A.
6-46-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Myneni S.[11]
6-37-63
R32
Kuhn N.[10]
Escoffier A.
4-67-654-0
Harris A.
Yang T.[15]
6-26-1
Kadhe A.
Hernandez J.[13]
6-36-2
Kwon S.[6]
Zhurbin A.
6-16-2
Moutet C.[2]
Saville L.
6-26-716-4
Grigelis L.[14]
Ly N.
4-66-26-1
Lee D.[8]
Nagal S.
6-36-4
Mukund S.[16]
Fanselow S.
6-36-1
Klein B.
Banes M.[12]
6-46-1
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Tokuda R.
3-66-26-3
Myneni S.[11]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-46-3
Mager G.[4]
Altamirano C.
6-36-1
Duckworth J.[7]
Gakhov I.
7-627-5
Safwat M.[3]
Pellegrino A.
6-37-5
Elias G.[9]
Ellis B.
6-27-64
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Altmaier D.
6-46-4
R64
Tokuda R.
Shanmugam A.
6-36-4
Ellis B.
Vishwakarma S.
6-26-2
Gakhov I.
Kelly D.
7-666-3
Saville L.
Echargui M.
7-676-1
Ly N.
Mousley B.
6-746-16-3
Escoffier A.
Tiurnev E.
6-26-2
Nagal S.
Perez Sanz D.
6-36-2
Pellegrino A.
Statham J.
6-46-4
Klein B.
Sureshkumar M.
6-26-3
Zhurbin A.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-4
Sundar Prashanth N.
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-22-66-2
Kadhe A.
Nedelko I.
6-46-1
Altmaier D.
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Fanselow S.
Wu T.
6-47-5
Harris A.
Vukic A.
6-46-4
Altamirano C.
Uesugi K.
1-66-37-68