Zdenek Kolar vs Zsombor Piros — Budapest CH Round of 32

Budapest CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zdenek Kolar
CZE15
Zdenek Kolar
#153ATP
1506ELO
1432Hard ELO
$121kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 February 2019
hard
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
Kolar Z.
6-7 6-1 6-2
Piros Z.
Kolar Z.
62662
Piros Z.
77121

Zdenek Kolar defeated Zsombor Piros 6-7 6-1 6-2 in the Budapest CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kolar Z.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Piros Z.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kolar Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kolar Z.Piros Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.1
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kolar Z.Piros Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
57
Break points saved·Dominant
53
84
Break points won·Even
28
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
58
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kolar Z.Piros Z.
Freshness·Dominant
90
54

Kolar Z.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d) · Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Bublik A.[8]
Marcora R.
6-06-3
Semi-finals
Marcora R.
Otte O.[6]
6-47-63
Bublik A.[8]
Horansky F.[12]
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Bublik A.[8]
Galovic V.[14]
3-66-36-4
Horansky F.[12]
Molcan A.
6-47-66
Otte O.[6]
Bourgue M.
6-36-3
Marcora R.
Kolar Z.[15]
2-66-36-2
R16
Bourgue M.
Crepatte B.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.[15]
Ignatik U.
6-45-77-5
Galovic V.[14]
Zapata Miralles B.
7-645-76-2
Bublik A.[8]
Kotov P.
6-756-26-2
Marcora R.
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Otte O.[6]
Milojevic N.[9]
6-36-4
Molcan A.
Janvier M.[13]
6-26-4
Horansky F.[12]
Baldi F.[7]
3-66-26-1
R32
Kotov P.
Coppejans K.[10]
6-42-66-3
Molcan A.
Novak D.[4]
6-23-0
Bourgue M.
Zopp J.[3]
6-36-1
Crepatte B.
Krawietz K.[16]
5-76-46-3
Kolar Z.[15]
Piros Z.
6-726-16-2
Baldi F.[7]
Muller A.
4-66-36-4
Zapata Miralles B.
Rosol L.[2]
6-37-5
Galovic V.[14]
Doumbia S.
7-656-2
Bublik A.[8]
Diez S.
6-17-5
Janvier M.[13]
Durasovic V.
7-603-66-3
Horansky F.[12]
Miedler L.
6-27-64
Otte O.[6]
Petrovic D.
7-623-67-65
Milojevic N.[9]
Griekspoor S.
6-46-716-4
Gombos N.
Griekspoor T.[11]
4-67-657-62
Ignatik U.
Ramanathan R.[1]
7-647-5
Marcora R.
Barrere G.[5]
7-626-3
R64
Zapata Miralles B.
Huesler M.
6-16-3
Miedler L.
Borsos G.
6-16-4
Muller A.
Grenier H.
6-26-4
Doumbia S.
Benchetrit E.
7-56-0
Kotov P.
Viola M.
1-66-46-3
Diez S.
Bonadio R.
6-46-2
Molcan A.
Heller P.
5-77-57-61
Durasovic V.
Serdarusic N.
6-26-2
Petrovic D.
Szintai D.
6-36-4
Griekspoor S.
Masur D.
6-23-66-4
Crepatte B.
Wang T.
6-37-5
Bourgue M.
Basso A.
6-37-60
Ignatik U.
Bega A.
6-47-5
Marcora R.
Nagy P.
6-26-1
Gombos N.
Karatsev A.
7-676-2
Piros Z.
Przysiezny M.
6-26-4