Borna Gojo vs Ernesto Escobedo — Dallas CH Round of 32

Dallas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 February 2019
hard
MEX13
Ernesto Escobedo
#1650ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWW
Gojo B.
6-4 6-4
Escobedo E.
Gojo B.
662
Escobedo E.
440

Borna Gojo defeated Ernesto Escobedo 6-4 6-4 in the Dallas CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Borna Gojo edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Escobedo E.

Escobedo E.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Escobedo E.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
5.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Escobedo E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
28
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
84
Break points won·Even
10
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
16
Tiebreaks·Even
73
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Escobedo E.
Freshness·
100
—

Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[14]
Mcdonald M.[1]
4-67-636-1
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[14]
Fratangelo B.[6]
W/O
Mcdonald M.[1]
Opelka R.[3]
6-47-613
Quarter-finals
Opelka R.[3]
Koepfer D.[9]
7-693-67-612
Fratangelo B.[6]
Jung J.[4]
7-666-766-1
Krueger M.[14]
Giron M.
7-56-766-3
Mcdonald M.[1]
Schnur B.[10]
6-26-2
R16
Krueger M.[14]
Vilella Martinez M.
6-26-1
Giron M.
Gomez E.
6-36-4
Fratangelo B.[6]
Hiltzik J.
7-637-62
Opelka R.[3]
Bellucci T.[15]
6-46-4
Jung J.[4]
Gojo B.
6-27-64
Schnur B.[10]
Redlicki M.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.[1]
Brown D.[16]
6-46-2
Koepfer D.[9]
King E.
7-57-63
R32
Vilella Martinez M.
Harrison R.[2]
W/O
Gomez E.
Eubanks C.[8]
7-6117-65
Mcdonald M.[1]
Broady L.
6-36-4
King E.
Kecmanovic M.[5]
6-30-0
Krueger M.[14]
Cid R.
6-43-66-3
Jung J.[4]
Harrison C.
6-747-657-5
Gojo B.
Escobedo E.[13]
6-46-4
Bellucci T.[15]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-45-77-5
Opelka R.[3]
Choinski J.
4-66-36-4
Redlicki M.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-736-2
Schnur B.[10]
Redlicki M.
7-646-4
Brown D.[16]
Rybakov A.
6-26-4
Hiltzik J.
Quiroz R.[11]
6-24-66-0
Koepfer D.[9]
Millot V.
6-46-1
Giron M.
Smyczek T.[12]
6-786-27-66
Fratangelo B.[6]
Peliwo F.
6-27-64
R64
Cid R.
Blanch U.
3-0
King E.
Song E.
6-46-4
Rybakov A.
Kozlov S.
6-26-1
Giron M.
Wessels L.
7-56-1
Kwiatkowski T.
Sels J.
4-67-616-4
Vilella Martinez M.
Sarkissian A.
6-46-4
Gomez E.
Novikov D.
6-16-1
Harrison C.
Cressy M.
6-47-64
Gojo B.
Brouwer G.
6-26-2
Peliwo F.
Franco Descotte M.
5-77-646-3
Millot V.
Blumberg W.
6-47-5
Choinski J.
Zhu E.
6-46-4
Karlovskiy E.
Adams H.
6-37-5
Redlicki M.
Oliveira G.
6-24-66-1
Broady L.
Souza J.
4-67-676-2
Hiltzik J.
Uchida K.
6-24-67-5