James Duckworth vs Ivan Gakhov — Chennai CH Round of 32

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
James Duckworth
AUS7
James Duckworth
#74ATP
1628ELO
1592Hard ELO
$485kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 February 2019
hard
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1387Hard ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Duckworth J.
7-6 7-5
Gakhov I.
Duckworth J.
7772
Gakhov I.
6250

James Duckworth defeated Ivan Gakhov 7-6 7-5 in the Chennai CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — James Duckworth came in ranked #74.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Duckworth J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Gakhov I.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Duckworth J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Duckworth J.Gakhov I.
25
Serve
—
13
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Duckworth J.Gakhov I.
1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
55%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.3
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Duckworth J.Gakhov I.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
54
34
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
82
Break points won·Slight edge
4
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
59
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Duckworth J.Gakhov I.
Freshness·
91
—

Duckworth J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Moutet C.[2]
Harris A.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Moutet C.[2]
Mukund S.[16]
3-66-46-2
Harris A.
Gunneswaran P.[1]
6-43-66-0
Quarter-finals
Moutet C.[2]
Kuhn N.[10]
5-76-36-4
Mukund S.[16]
Klein B.
6-23-67-63
Harris A.
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
1-67-666-2
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Duckworth J.[7]
6-46-3
R16
Harris A.
Mager G.[4]
7-627-62
Mukund S.[16]
Safwat M.[3]
6-36-4
Kuhn N.[10]
Lee D.[8]
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[7]
Elias G.[9]
4-67-57-5
Moutet C.[2]
Grigelis L.[14]
6-26-3
Klein B.
Kwon S.[6]
6-44-66-3
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Kadhe A.
6-46-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Myneni S.[11]
6-37-63
R32
Kuhn N.[10]
Escoffier A.
4-67-654-0
Harris A.
Yang T.[15]
6-26-1
Kadhe A.
Hernandez J.[13]
6-36-2
Kwon S.[6]
Zhurbin A.
6-16-2
Moutet C.[2]
Saville L.
6-26-716-4
Grigelis L.[14]
Ly N.
4-66-26-1
Lee D.[8]
Nagal S.
6-36-4
Mukund S.[16]
Fanselow S.
6-36-1
Klein B.
Banes M.[12]
6-46-1
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Tokuda R.
3-66-26-3
Myneni S.[11]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-46-3
Mager G.[4]
Altamirano C.
6-36-1
Duckworth J.[7]
Gakhov I.
7-627-5
Safwat M.[3]
Pellegrino A.
6-37-5
Elias G.[9]
Ellis B.
6-27-64
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Altmaier D.
6-46-4
R64
Tokuda R.
Shanmugam A.
6-36-4
Ellis B.
Vishwakarma S.
6-26-2
Gakhov I.
Kelly D.
7-666-3
Saville L.
Echargui M.
7-676-1
Ly N.
Mousley B.
6-746-16-3
Escoffier A.
Tiurnev E.
6-26-2
Nagal S.
Perez Sanz D.
6-36-2
Pellegrino A.
Statham J.
6-46-4
Klein B.
Sureshkumar M.
6-26-3
Zhurbin A.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-4
Sundar Prashanth N.
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-22-66-2
Kadhe A.
Nedelko I.
6-46-1
Altmaier D.
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Fanselow S.
Wu T.
6-47-5
Harris A.
Vukic A.
6-46-4
Altamirano C.
Uesugi K.
1-66-37-68