Daniel Altmaier vs Daniel Nguyen — Chennai CH Round of 64

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Daniel Altmaier
GER
Daniel Altmaier
#60ATP
1734ELO
1652Hard ELO
$574kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 February 2019
hard
USA
Daniel Nguyen
35 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
Altmaier D.
6-3 6-2
Nguyen D.
Altmaier D.
662
Nguyen D.
320

Daniel Altmaier defeated Daniel Nguyen 6-3 6-2 in the Chennai CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Altmaier D.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Nguyen D.

Nguyen D.serving77% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Altmaier D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Altmaier D.Nguyen D.
16
Serve
—
4
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Altmaier D.Nguyen D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
45%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
3.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
5.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Altmaier D.Nguyen D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
21
Break points saved·Dominant
96
37
Break points won·Clear edge
34
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
59
Tiebreaks·Dominant
82
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Altmaier D.Nguyen D.
Freshness·
96
—

Altmaier D.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Moutet C.[2]
Harris A.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Moutet C.[2]
Mukund S.[16]
3-66-46-2
Harris A.
Gunneswaran P.[1]
6-43-66-0
Quarter-finals
Moutet C.[2]
Kuhn N.[10]
5-76-36-4
Mukund S.[16]
Klein B.
6-23-67-63
Harris A.
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
1-67-666-2
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Duckworth J.[7]
6-46-3
R16
Harris A.
Mager G.[4]
7-627-62
Mukund S.[16]
Safwat M.[3]
6-36-4
Kuhn N.[10]
Lee D.[8]
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[7]
Elias G.[9]
4-67-57-5
Moutet C.[2]
Grigelis L.[14]
6-26-3
Klein B.
Kwon S.[6]
6-44-66-3
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Kadhe A.
6-46-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Myneni S.[11]
6-37-63
R32
Kuhn N.[10]
Escoffier A.
4-67-654-0
Harris A.
Yang T.[15]
6-26-1
Kadhe A.
Hernandez J.[13]
6-36-2
Kwon S.[6]
Zhurbin A.
6-16-2
Moutet C.[2]
Saville L.
6-26-716-4
Grigelis L.[14]
Ly N.
4-66-26-1
Lee D.[8]
Nagal S.
6-36-4
Mukund S.[16]
Fanselow S.
6-36-1
Klein B.
Banes M.[12]
6-46-1
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Tokuda R.
3-66-26-3
Myneni S.[11]
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-46-3
Mager G.[4]
Altamirano C.
6-36-1
Duckworth J.[7]
Gakhov I.
7-627-5
Safwat M.[3]
Pellegrino A.
6-37-5
Elias G.[9]
Ellis B.
6-27-64
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Altmaier D.
6-46-4
R64
Tokuda R.
Shanmugam A.
6-36-4
Ellis B.
Vishwakarma S.
6-26-2
Gakhov I.
Kelly D.
7-666-3
Saville L.
Echargui M.
7-676-1
Ly N.
Mousley B.
6-746-16-3
Escoffier A.
Tiurnev E.
6-26-2
Nagal S.
Perez Sanz D.
6-36-2
Pellegrino A.
Statham J.
6-46-4
Klein B.
Sureshkumar M.
6-26-3
Zhurbin A.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-4
Sundar Prashanth N.
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-22-66-2
Kadhe A.
Nedelko I.
6-46-1
Altmaier D.
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Fanselow S.
Wu T.
6-47-5
Harris A.
Vukic A.
6-46-4
Altamirano C.
Uesugi K.
1-66-37-68