Roman Safiullin vs Hugo Nys — Quimper CH Round of 64

Quimper CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Roman Safiullin
RUS
Roman Safiullin
#96ATP
1750ELO
1704Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$4.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 January 2019
hard
MON
Hugo Nys
35 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Safiullin R.
6-4 6-4
Nys H.
Safiullin R.
662
Nys H.
440

Roman Safiullin defeated Hugo Nys 6-4 6-4 in the Quimper CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Roman Safiullin edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Safiullin R.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Nys H.

Nys H.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Safiullin R.

Serve advantage — Safiullin R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Safiullin R.Nys H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.4
5.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Safiullin R.Nys H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
68
30
Break points saved·Dominant
96
70
Break points won·Dominant
44
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
76
29
Tiebreaks·Even
78
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Safiullin R.Nys H.
Freshness·
84
—

Safiullin R.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Barrere G.[15]
Evans D.
4-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Evans D.
Humbert U.[2]
6-26-4
Barrere G.[15]
Bourgue M.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Humbert U.[2]
Kamke T.
6-766-26-4
Evans D.
Safiullin R.
3-66-37-61
Barrere G.[15]
Zopp J.[10]
6-37-63
Bourgue M.
Bachinger M.[6]
4-66-36-2
R16
Bourgue M.
Kotov P.
7-56-4
Humbert U.[2]
Otte O.
6-46-4
Kamke T.
Stakhovsky S.[8]
3-66-37-65
Safiullin R.
Muller A.
6-47-66
Evans D.
Lestienne C.[9]
3-67-627-64
Bachinger M.[6]
Brands D.
6-747-666-3
Zopp J.[10]
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
6-27-63
Barrere G.[15]
Hurkacz H.[1]
7-626-756-1
R32
Kotov P.
Granollers M.[3]
4-66-46-3
Barrere G.[15]
Hemery C.
7-652-67-61
Stakhovsky S.[8]
Miedler L.
6-737-627-64
Hurkacz H.[1]
Vatutin A.
7-637-5
Lestienne C.[9]
Guinard M.
6-36-2
Kamke T.
Ornago F.
6-06-4
Bourgue M.
Gerasimov E.[14]
2-66-26-4
Humbert U.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-47-612
Otte O.
Baldi F.[16]
7-54-66-1
Safiullin R.
Berankis R.[4]
6-37-64
Muller A.
Moraing M.[13]
3-67-687-62
Evans D.
Halys Q.[5]
2-66-47-64
Bachinger M.[6]
De Bakker T.
6-776-47-5
Brands D.
Caruso S.[12]
6-47-64
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
Jacq G.
6-07-61
Zopp J.[10]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-17-65
R64
Miedler L.
Donati M.
6-36-4
Muller A.
Janvier M.
3-67-686-4
Kamke T.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-26-4
Guinard M.
Darcis S.
6-23-66-4
Brands D.
Gaston H.
6-27-63
Jacq G.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-12-67-5
Barranco Cosano J.
Gueydan Q.
4-66-26-4
Brancaccio R.
Taberner C.
7-57-64
Otte O.
Zapata Miralles B.
4-66-46-3
Safiullin R.
Nys H.
6-46-4
Evans D.
Bittoun Kouzmine C.
6-36-0
De Bakker T.
Karatsev A.
4-67-56-0
Bourgue M.
Ortega Olmedo R.
4-67-616-4
Kotov P.
Kolar Z.
6-767-56-3
Hemery C.
Furness E.
6-37-65
Vatutin A.
Benchetrit E.
7-56-4