Max Purcell vs Stefano Napolitano — Launceston CH Round of 32

Launceston CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 January 2019
hard
Stefano Napolitano
ITA9
Stefano Napolitano
#240ATP
1528ELO
1456Hard ELO
31 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLLLWWW
Purcell M.
7-5 6-2
Napolitano S.
Purcell M.
762
Napolitano S.
520

Max Purcell defeated Stefano Napolitano 7-5 6-2 in the Launceston CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Max Purcell came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Max Purcell closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Napolitano S.

Napolitano S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Napolitano S.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.6
4.7
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Napolitano S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
35
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
77
Break points won·Even
10
13
Deciding sets·Clear edge
84
60
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Purcell M.Napolitano S.
Freshness·
—
81

Napolitano S.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 24 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[1]
Giustino L.[12]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Giustino L.[12]
Saville L.
7-652-67-5
Harris L.[1]
Sela D.[16]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Giustino L.[12]
Clarke J.[15]
3-67-54-1
Sela D.[16]
Purcell M.
7-667-5
Saville L.
Lamasine T.
6-46-4
Harris L.[1]
Kuhn N.
6-47-63
R16
Sela D.[16]
Martinez P.[3]
6-45-1
Saville L.
Soeda G.[11]
6-46-2
Clarke J.[15]
Ito T.[2]
6-26-737-5
Giustino L.[12]
Banes M.
7-6106-3
Harris L.[1]
Bourchier H.
6-36-3
Lamasine T.
Yang T.
6-36-2
Purcell M.
Takahashi Y.
6-46-4
Kuhn N.
Ofner S.[5]
7-626-3
R32
Yang T.
Clezar G.[14]
7-57-62
Ofner S.[5]
Lopez Perez E.
4-4
Harris L.[1]
Ellis B.
6-26-3
Purcell M.
Napolitano S.[9]
7-56-2
Sela D.[16]
Harris A.
6-36-2
Ito T.[2]
Grills J.
6-26-4
Clarke J.[15]
Shimizu Y.
7-56-1
Giustino L.[12]
Chung Y.
6-36-716-3
Banes M.
Robert S.[8]
6-37-67
Lamasine T.
Polmans M.[4]
6-34-66-3
Soeda G.[11]
Perez Sanz D.
6-03-66-2
Takahashi Y.
Moriya H.[6]
6-36-4
Martinez P.[3]
Nguyen D.
7-57-62
Kuhn N.
Gaio F.[10]
6-16-4
Bourchier H.
Moroni G.[13]
7-656-3
Saville L.
Safwat M.[7]
6-26-4
R64
Shimizu Y.
Santillan A.
6-43-2
Bourchier H.
Mousley B.
7-631-0
Lamasine T.
Tokuda R.
6-46-1
Takahashi Y.
Altmaier D.
4-66-46-4
Grills J.
Bega A.
6-726-26-3
Chung Y.
Statham J.
6-46-3
Banes M.
Ochi M.
6-16-1
Yang T.
Vukic A.
6-36-2
Perez Sanz D.
Samper Montana J.
6-36-3
Saville L.
Zhurbin A.
6-26-2
Harris A.
Hijikata R.
1-67-656-3
Nguyen D.
Kelly D.
6-32-67-5
Lopez Perez E.
Fanselow S.
6-46-2
Kuhn N.
Whittington A.
6-17-5
Purcell M.
Diez S.
6-36-3
Ellis B.
Oconnell C.
7-646-4