Pedro Martinez vs Daniel Nguyen — Launceston CH Round of 32

Launceston CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Pedro Martinez
ESP3
Pedro Martinez
#157ATP
1580ELO
1552Hard ELO
$335kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 January 2019
hard
USA
Daniel Nguyen
35 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
Martinez P.
7-5 7-6
Nguyen D.
Martinez P.
7772
Nguyen D.
5620

Pedro Martinez defeated Daniel Nguyen 7-5 7-6 in the Launceston CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Martinez P.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Nguyen D.

Nguyen D.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Martinez P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Martinez P.Nguyen D.
0
Serve
—
1
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Martinez P.Nguyen D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.6
3.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
5.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Martinez P.Nguyen D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
21
Break points saved·Dominant
94
37
Break points won·Clear edge
41
22
Deciding sets·Clear edge
73
59
Tiebreaks·Dominant
82
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Martinez P.Nguyen D.
Freshness·
82
—

Martinez P.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 58 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[1]
Giustino L.[12]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Giustino L.[12]
Saville L.
7-652-67-5
Harris L.[1]
Sela D.[16]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Giustino L.[12]
Clarke J.[15]
3-67-54-1
Sela D.[16]
Purcell M.
7-667-5
Saville L.
Lamasine T.
6-46-4
Harris L.[1]
Kuhn N.
6-47-63
R16
Sela D.[16]
Martinez P.[3]
6-45-1
Saville L.
Soeda G.[11]
6-46-2
Clarke J.[15]
Ito T.[2]
6-26-737-5
Giustino L.[12]
Banes M.
7-6106-3
Harris L.[1]
Bourchier H.
6-36-3
Lamasine T.
Yang T.
6-36-2
Purcell M.
Takahashi Y.
6-46-4
Kuhn N.
Ofner S.[5]
7-626-3
R32
Yang T.
Clezar G.[14]
7-57-62
Ofner S.[5]
Lopez Perez E.
4-4
Harris L.[1]
Ellis B.
6-26-3
Purcell M.
Napolitano S.[9]
7-56-2
Sela D.[16]
Harris A.
6-36-2
Ito T.[2]
Grills J.
6-26-4
Clarke J.[15]
Shimizu Y.
7-56-1
Giustino L.[12]
Chung Y.
6-36-716-3
Banes M.
Robert S.[8]
6-37-67
Lamasine T.
Polmans M.[4]
6-34-66-3
Soeda G.[11]
Perez Sanz D.
6-03-66-2
Takahashi Y.
Moriya H.[6]
6-36-4
Martinez P.[3]
Nguyen D.
7-57-62
Kuhn N.
Gaio F.[10]
6-16-4
Bourchier H.
Moroni G.[13]
7-656-3
Saville L.
Safwat M.[7]
6-26-4
R64
Shimizu Y.
Santillan A.
6-43-2
Bourchier H.
Mousley B.
7-631-0
Lamasine T.
Tokuda R.
6-46-1
Takahashi Y.
Altmaier D.
4-66-46-4
Grills J.
Bega A.
6-726-26-3
Chung Y.
Statham J.
6-46-3
Banes M.
Ochi M.
6-16-1
Yang T.
Vukic A.
6-36-2
Perez Sanz D.
Samper Montana J.
6-36-3
Saville L.
Zhurbin A.
6-26-2
Harris A.
Hijikata R.
1-67-656-3
Nguyen D.
Kelly D.
6-32-67-5
Lopez Perez E.
Fanselow S.
6-46-2
Kuhn N.
Whittington A.
6-17-5
Purcell M.
Diez S.
6-36-3
Ellis B.
Oconnell C.
7-646-4