Ugo Humbert vs Tobias Kamke — Quimper CH Quarter-final

Quimper CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Ugo Humbert
FRA2
Ugo Humbert
#29ATP
1868ELO
1843Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 January 2019
hard
GER
Tobias Kamke
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
Humbert U.
6-7 6-2 6-4
Kamke T.
Humbert U.
66662
Kamke T.
78241

Ugo Humbert defeated Tobias Kamke 6-7 6-2 6-4 in the Quimper CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Humbert U.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kamke T.

Kamke T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Serve advantage — Humbert U.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Humbert U.Kamke T.
64
Serve
—
15
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Humbert U.Kamke T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.8
1.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 137). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Humbert U.Kamke T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
14
Break points saved·Dominant
99
69
Break points won·Clear edge
37
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
17
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Humbert U.Kamke T.
Freshness·
96
—

Humbert U.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Barrere G.[15]
Evans D.
4-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Evans D.
Humbert U.[2]
6-26-4
Barrere G.[15]
Bourgue M.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Humbert U.[2]
Kamke T.
6-766-26-4
Evans D.
Safiullin R.
3-66-37-61
Barrere G.[15]
Zopp J.[10]
6-37-63
Bourgue M.
Bachinger M.[6]
4-66-36-2
R16
Bourgue M.
Kotov P.
7-56-4
Humbert U.[2]
Otte O.
6-46-4
Kamke T.
Stakhovsky S.[8]
3-66-37-65
Safiullin R.
Muller A.
6-47-66
Evans D.
Lestienne C.[9]
3-67-627-64
Bachinger M.[6]
Brands D.
6-747-666-3
Zopp J.[10]
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
6-27-63
Barrere G.[15]
Hurkacz H.[1]
7-626-756-1
R32
Kotov P.
Granollers M.[3]
4-66-46-3
Barrere G.[15]
Hemery C.
7-652-67-61
Stakhovsky S.[8]
Miedler L.
6-737-627-64
Hurkacz H.[1]
Vatutin A.
7-637-5
Lestienne C.[9]
Guinard M.
6-36-2
Kamke T.
Ornago F.
6-06-4
Bourgue M.
Gerasimov E.[14]
2-66-26-4
Humbert U.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-47-612
Otte O.
Baldi F.[16]
7-54-66-1
Safiullin R.
Berankis R.[4]
6-37-64
Muller A.
Moraing M.[13]
3-67-687-62
Evans D.
Halys Q.[5]
2-66-47-64
Bachinger M.[6]
De Bakker T.
6-776-47-5
Brands D.
Caruso S.[12]
6-47-64
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
Jacq G.
6-07-61
Zopp J.[10]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-17-65
R64
Miedler L.
Donati M.
6-36-4
Muller A.
Janvier M.
3-67-686-4
Kamke T.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-26-4
Guinard M.
Darcis S.
6-23-66-4
Brands D.
Gaston H.
6-27-63
Jacq G.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-12-67-5
Barranco Cosano J.
Gueydan Q.
4-66-26-4
Brancaccio R.
Taberner C.
7-57-64
Otte O.
Zapata Miralles B.
4-66-46-3
Safiullin R.
Nys H.
6-46-4
Evans D.
Bittoun Kouzmine C.
6-36-0
De Bakker T.
Karatsev A.
4-67-56-0
Bourgue M.
Ortega Olmedo R.
4-67-616-4
Kotov P.
Kolar Z.
6-767-56-3
Hemery C.
Furness E.
6-37-65
Vatutin A.
Benchetrit E.
7-56-4