Daniel Evans vs Ugo Humbert — Quimper CH Semi-final

Quimper CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Daniel Evans
GBR
Daniel Evans
#501ATP
1588ELO
1562Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 January 2019
hard
Ugo Humbert
FRA2
Ugo Humbert
#29ATP
1868ELO
1843Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Evans D.
6-2 6-4
Humbert U.
Evans D.
662
Humbert U.
240

Daniel Evans defeated Ugo Humbert 6-2 6-4 in the Quimper CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Ugo Humbert came in ranked #29, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Daniel Evans claimed a first win over Ugo Humbert in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-06-09s HertogenboschR16grassUgo Humbert7-5 6-3
2020-10-19AntwerpSFhardUgo Humbert4-6 7-6(7) 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Evans D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Humbert U.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Evans D.Humbert U.
—
Serve
64
—
Return
15

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Evans D.Humbert U.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
6.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Evans D.Humbert U.
Clutch Rating·Even
73
70
Break points saved·Even
97
99
Break points won·Clear edge
61
37
Deciding sets·Even
82
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Evans D.Humbert U.
Freshness·Even
100
96

Evans D.: 20 days rest · Humbert U.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Barrere G.[15]
Evans D.
4-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Evans D.
Humbert U.[2]
6-26-4
Barrere G.[15]
Bourgue M.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Humbert U.[2]
Kamke T.
6-766-26-4
Evans D.
Safiullin R.
3-66-37-61
Barrere G.[15]
Zopp J.[10]
6-37-63
Bourgue M.
Bachinger M.[6]
4-66-36-2
R16
Bourgue M.
Kotov P.
7-56-4
Humbert U.[2]
Otte O.
6-46-4
Kamke T.
Stakhovsky S.[8]
3-66-37-65
Safiullin R.
Muller A.
6-47-66
Evans D.
Lestienne C.[9]
3-67-627-64
Bachinger M.[6]
Brands D.
6-747-666-3
Zopp J.[10]
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
6-27-63
Barrere G.[15]
Hurkacz H.[1]
7-626-756-1
R32
Kotov P.
Granollers M.[3]
4-66-46-3
Barrere G.[15]
Hemery C.
7-652-67-61
Stakhovsky S.[8]
Miedler L.
6-737-627-64
Hurkacz H.[1]
Vatutin A.
7-637-5
Lestienne C.[9]
Guinard M.
6-36-2
Kamke T.
Ornago F.
6-06-4
Bourgue M.
Gerasimov E.[14]
2-66-26-4
Humbert U.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-47-612
Otte O.
Baldi F.[16]
7-54-66-1
Safiullin R.
Berankis R.[4]
6-37-64
Muller A.
Moraing M.[13]
3-67-687-62
Evans D.
Halys Q.[5]
2-66-47-64
Bachinger M.[6]
De Bakker T.
6-776-47-5
Brands D.
Caruso S.[12]
6-47-64
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
Jacq G.
6-07-61
Zopp J.[10]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-17-65
R64
Miedler L.
Donati M.
6-36-4
Muller A.
Janvier M.
3-67-686-4
Kamke T.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-26-4
Guinard M.
Darcis S.
6-23-66-4
Brands D.
Gaston H.
6-27-63
Jacq G.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-12-67-5
Barranco Cosano J.
Gueydan Q.
4-66-26-4
Brancaccio R.
Taberner C.
7-57-64
Otte O.
Zapata Miralles B.
4-66-46-3
Safiullin R.
Nys H.
6-46-4
Evans D.
Bittoun Kouzmine C.
6-36-0
De Bakker T.
Karatsev A.
4-67-56-0
Bourgue M.
Ortega Olmedo R.
4-67-616-4
Kotov P.
Kolar Z.
6-767-56-3
Hemery C.
Furness E.
6-37-65
Vatutin A.
Benchetrit E.
7-56-4