Daniel Evans vs Quentin Halys — Quimper CH Round of 32

Quimper CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Daniel Evans
GBR
Daniel Evans
#501ATP
1588ELO
1562Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 January 2019
hard
Quentin Halys
FRA5
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Evans D.
2-6 6-4 7-6
Halys Q.
Evans D.
26772
Halys Q.
64641

Daniel Evans defeated Quentin Halys 2-6 6-4 7-6 in the Quimper CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending the title. Daniel Evans claimed a first win over Quentin Halys in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-03WimbledonR128grassQuentin Halys6-2 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Evans D.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Evans D.Halys Q.
—
Serve
39
—
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Evans D.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
11.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Evans D.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
73
57
Break points saved·Even
97
97
Break points won·Dominant
61
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
82
75
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Evans D.Halys Q.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
93

Evans D.: 20 days rest · Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Barrere G.[15]
Evans D.
4-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Evans D.
Humbert U.[2]
6-26-4
Barrere G.[15]
Bourgue M.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Humbert U.[2]
Kamke T.
6-766-26-4
Evans D.
Safiullin R.
3-66-37-61
Barrere G.[15]
Zopp J.[10]
6-37-63
Bourgue M.
Bachinger M.[6]
4-66-36-2
R16
Bourgue M.
Kotov P.
7-56-4
Humbert U.[2]
Otte O.
6-46-4
Kamke T.
Stakhovsky S.[8]
3-66-37-65
Safiullin R.
Muller A.
6-47-66
Evans D.
Lestienne C.[9]
3-67-627-64
Bachinger M.[6]
Brands D.
6-747-666-3
Zopp J.[10]
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
6-27-63
Barrere G.[15]
Hurkacz H.[1]
7-626-756-1
R32
Kotov P.
Granollers M.[3]
4-66-46-3
Barrere G.[15]
Hemery C.
7-652-67-61
Stakhovsky S.[8]
Miedler L.
6-737-627-64
Hurkacz H.[1]
Vatutin A.
7-637-5
Lestienne C.[9]
Guinard M.
6-36-2
Kamke T.
Ornago F.
6-06-4
Bourgue M.
Gerasimov E.[14]
2-66-26-4
Humbert U.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-47-612
Otte O.
Baldi F.[16]
7-54-66-1
Safiullin R.
Berankis R.[4]
6-37-64
Muller A.
Moraing M.[13]
3-67-687-62
Evans D.
Halys Q.[5]
2-66-47-64
Bachinger M.[6]
De Bakker T.
6-776-47-5
Brands D.
Caruso S.[12]
6-47-64
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
Jacq G.
6-07-61
Zopp J.[10]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-17-65
R64
Miedler L.
Donati M.
6-36-4
Muller A.
Janvier M.
3-67-686-4
Kamke T.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-26-4
Guinard M.
Darcis S.
6-23-66-4
Brands D.
Gaston H.
6-27-63
Jacq G.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-12-67-5
Barranco Cosano J.
Gueydan Q.
4-66-26-4
Brancaccio R.
Taberner C.
7-57-64
Otte O.
Zapata Miralles B.
4-66-46-3
Safiullin R.
Nys H.
6-46-4
Evans D.
Bittoun Kouzmine C.
6-36-0
De Bakker T.
Karatsev A.
4-67-56-0
Bourgue M.
Ortega Olmedo R.
4-67-616-4
Kotov P.
Kolar Z.
6-767-56-3
Hemery C.
Furness E.
6-37-65
Vatutin A.
Benchetrit E.
7-56-4