Blake Ellis vs Christopher Oconnell — Launceston CH Round of 64

Launceston CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
AUS
Blake Ellis
#472ATP
1416ELO
1390Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 January 2019
hard
AUS
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Ellis B.
7-6 6-4
Oconnell C.
Ellis B.
7762
Oconnell C.
6440

Blake Ellis defeated Christopher Oconnell 7-6 6-4 in the Launceston CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ellis B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Oconnell C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Ellis B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ellis B.Oconnell C.
—
Serve
20
—
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ellis B.Oconnell C.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.8
7.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (109 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ellis B.Oconnell C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
41
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
98
Break points won·Clear edge
3
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
38
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ellis B.Oconnell C.
Freshness·
92
—

Ellis B.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[1]
Giustino L.[12]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Giustino L.[12]
Saville L.
7-652-67-5
Harris L.[1]
Sela D.[16]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Giustino L.[12]
Clarke J.[15]
3-67-54-1
Sela D.[16]
Purcell M.
7-667-5
Saville L.
Lamasine T.
6-46-4
Harris L.[1]
Kuhn N.
6-47-63
R16
Sela D.[16]
Martinez P.[3]
6-45-1
Saville L.
Soeda G.[11]
6-46-2
Clarke J.[15]
Ito T.[2]
6-26-737-5
Giustino L.[12]
Banes M.
7-6106-3
Harris L.[1]
Bourchier H.
6-36-3
Lamasine T.
Yang T.
6-36-2
Purcell M.
Takahashi Y.
6-46-4
Kuhn N.
Ofner S.[5]
7-626-3
R32
Yang T.
Clezar G.[14]
7-57-62
Ofner S.[5]
Lopez Perez E.
4-4
Harris L.[1]
Ellis B.
6-26-3
Purcell M.
Napolitano S.[9]
7-56-2
Sela D.[16]
Harris A.
6-36-2
Ito T.[2]
Grills J.
6-26-4
Clarke J.[15]
Shimizu Y.
7-56-1
Giustino L.[12]
Chung Y.
6-36-716-3
Banes M.
Robert S.[8]
6-37-67
Lamasine T.
Polmans M.[4]
6-34-66-3
Soeda G.[11]
Perez Sanz D.
6-03-66-2
Takahashi Y.
Moriya H.[6]
6-36-4
Martinez P.[3]
Nguyen D.
7-57-62
Kuhn N.
Gaio F.[10]
6-16-4
Bourchier H.
Moroni G.[13]
7-656-3
Saville L.
Safwat M.[7]
6-26-4
R64
Shimizu Y.
Santillan A.
6-43-2
Bourchier H.
Mousley B.
7-631-0
Lamasine T.
Tokuda R.
6-46-1
Takahashi Y.
Altmaier D.
4-66-46-4
Grills J.
Bega A.
6-726-26-3
Chung Y.
Statham J.
6-46-3
Banes M.
Ochi M.
6-16-1
Yang T.
Vukic A.
6-36-2
Perez Sanz D.
Samper Montana J.
6-36-3
Saville L.
Zhurbin A.
6-26-2
Harris A.
Hijikata R.
1-67-656-3
Nguyen D.
Kelly D.
6-32-67-5
Lopez Perez E.
Fanselow S.
6-46-2
Kuhn N.
Whittington A.
6-17-5
Purcell M.
Diez S.
6-36-3
Ellis B.
Oconnell C.
7-646-4