Max Purcell vs Sebastian Ofner — Burnie CH Round of 32

Burnie CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 January 2019
hard
Sebastian Ofner
AUT6
Sebastian Ofner
#125ATP
1713ELO
1655Hard ELO
$345kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWL
Purcell M.
7-6 6-2
Ofner S.
Purcell M.
7762
Ofner S.
6320

Max Purcell defeated Sebastian Ofner 7-6 6-2 in the Burnie CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Max Purcell came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Max Purcell closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ofner S.

Ofner S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Ofner S.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Even
7.6
7.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Ofner S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
70
Break points saved·Even
92
93
Break points won·Dominant
10
43
Deciding sets·Even
84
82
Tiebreaks·Even
81
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Purcell M.Ofner S.
Freshness·
—
83

Ofner S.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 48 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Diez S.
Banes M.
7-56-1
Semi-finals
Banes M.
Majchrzak K.[5]
6-767-636-3
Diez S.
Clarke J.[16]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Banes M.
Robert S.[9]
4-66-36-4
Clarke J.[16]
Napolitano S.[10]
4-66-46-3
Majchrzak K.[5]
Fanselow S.
6-16-2
Diez S.
Bourchier H.
6-26-2
R16
Fanselow S.
Polmans M.[4]
3-66-47-62
Banes M.
Beale J.
3-66-22-0
Bourchier H.
Giustino L.[13]
7-6147-65
Robert S.[9]
Li Z.
7-686-3
Majchrzak K.[5]
Soeda G.[12]
7-56-2
Diez S.
Safwat M.[8]
6-16-3
Clarke J.[16]
Basic M.[1]
6-16-3
Napolitano S.[10]
Purcell M.
6-47-63
R32
Purcell M.
Ofner S.[6]
7-636-2
Polmans M.[4]
Duckworth J.
6-43-66-4
Bourchier H.
Martinez P.[3]
6-31-67-5
Banes M.
Harris L.[2]
6-47-5
Soeda G.[12]
Oconnell C.
6-46-2
Fanselow S.
Moroni G.[14]
4-66-46-2
Robert S.[9]
Zhurbin A.
6-24-66-3
Li Z.
Moriya H.[7]
6-36-4
Majchrzak K.[5]
Sela D.
6-34-66-1
Safwat M.[8]
Grills J.
6-46-2
Diez S.
Gaio F.[11]
3-66-16-4
Giustino L.[13]
Chung Y.
6-26-3
Napolitano S.[10]
Kuhn N.
6-16-1
Basic M.[1]
Saville L.
3-67-56-3
Beale J.
Clezar G.[15]
6-26-4
Clarke J.[16]
Bega A.
6-16-4
R64
Beale J.
Mousley B.
7-6113-1
Bourchier H.
Heliovaara H.
7-653-2
Li Z.
Harris A.
7-56-746-3
Purcell M.
Perez Sanz D.
6-26-2
Oconnell C.
Wu D.
7-687-64
Fanselow S.
Yang T.
6-46-3
Bega A.
Brkic T.
6-36-2
Zhurbin A.
Kelly D.
6-46-4
Sela D.
Lamasine T.
6-756-26-1
Kuhn N.
Santillan A.
6-47-65
Banes M.
Ilkel C.
3-66-37-66
Duckworth J.
Vukic A.
6-26-3
Diez S.
Altmaier D.
1-66-36-1
Saville L.
Doumbia S.
7-56-2
Chung Y.
Samper Montana J.
7-56-1
Grills J.
Lopez Perez E.
6-26-1