Christopher Oconnell vs Di Wu — Burnie CH Round of 64

Burnie CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
AUS
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 January 2019
hard
CHN
Di Wu
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWLLL
Oconnell C.
7-6 7-6
Wu D.
Oconnell C.
710772
Wu D.
68640

Christopher Oconnell defeated Di Wu 7-6 7-6 in the Burnie CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wu D.

Wu D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Wu D.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Wu D.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.1
2.9
Double faults / match·Even
1.7
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 44). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Wu D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
4
Break points saved·Dominant
98
37
Break points won·Even
22
21
Deciding sets·Clear edge
38
18
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Diez S.
Banes M.
7-56-1
Semi-finals
Banes M.
Majchrzak K.[5]
6-767-636-3
Diez S.
Clarke J.[16]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Banes M.
Robert S.[9]
4-66-36-4
Clarke J.[16]
Napolitano S.[10]
4-66-46-3
Majchrzak K.[5]
Fanselow S.
6-16-2
Diez S.
Bourchier H.
6-26-2
R16
Fanselow S.
Polmans M.[4]
3-66-47-62
Banes M.
Beale J.
3-66-22-0
Bourchier H.
Giustino L.[13]
7-6147-65
Robert S.[9]
Li Z.
7-686-3
Majchrzak K.[5]
Soeda G.[12]
7-56-2
Diez S.
Safwat M.[8]
6-16-3
Clarke J.[16]
Basic M.[1]
6-16-3
Napolitano S.[10]
Purcell M.
6-47-63
R32
Purcell M.
Ofner S.[6]
7-636-2
Polmans M.[4]
Duckworth J.
6-43-66-4
Bourchier H.
Martinez P.[3]
6-31-67-5
Banes M.
Harris L.[2]
6-47-5
Soeda G.[12]
Oconnell C.
6-46-2
Fanselow S.
Moroni G.[14]
4-66-46-2
Robert S.[9]
Zhurbin A.
6-24-66-3
Li Z.
Moriya H.[7]
6-36-4
Majchrzak K.[5]
Sela D.
6-34-66-1
Safwat M.[8]
Grills J.
6-46-2
Diez S.
Gaio F.[11]
3-66-16-4
Giustino L.[13]
Chung Y.
6-26-3
Napolitano S.[10]
Kuhn N.
6-16-1
Basic M.[1]
Saville L.
3-67-56-3
Beale J.
Clezar G.[15]
6-26-4
Clarke J.[16]
Bega A.
6-16-4
R64
Beale J.
Mousley B.
7-6113-1
Bourchier H.
Heliovaara H.
7-653-2
Li Z.
Harris A.
7-56-746-3
Purcell M.
Perez Sanz D.
6-26-2
Oconnell C.
Wu D.
7-687-64
Fanselow S.
Yang T.
6-46-3
Bega A.
Brkic T.
6-36-2
Zhurbin A.
Kelly D.
6-46-4
Sela D.
Lamasine T.
6-756-26-1
Kuhn N.
Santillan A.
6-47-65
Banes M.
Ilkel C.
3-66-37-66
Duckworth J.
Vukic A.
6-26-3
Diez S.
Altmaier D.
1-66-36-1
Saville L.
Doumbia S.
7-56-2
Chung Y.
Samper Montana J.
7-56-1
Grills J.
Lopez Perez E.
6-26-1