Kamil Majchrzak vs Go Soeda — Burnie CH Round of 16

Burnie CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Kamil Majchrzak
POL5
Kamil Majchrzak
#66ATP
1801ELO
1739Hard ELO
$617kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 January 2019
hard
JPN12
Go Soeda
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Majchrzak K.
7-5 6-2
Soeda G.
Majchrzak K.
762
Soeda G.
520

Kamil Majchrzak defeated Go Soeda 7-5 6-2 in the Burnie CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Majchrzak K.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Soeda G.

Soeda G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Majchrzak K.

Serve advantage — Majchrzak K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Majchrzak K.Soeda G.
24
Serve
—
48
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Majchrzak K.Soeda G.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Majchrzak K.Soeda G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
68
23
Break points saved·Dominant
97
61
Break points won·Dominant
51
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
73
46
Tiebreaks·Dominant
75
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Majchrzak K.Soeda G.
Freshness·
92
—

Majchrzak K.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Diez S.
Banes M.
7-56-1
Semi-finals
Banes M.
Majchrzak K.[5]
6-767-636-3
Diez S.
Clarke J.[16]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Banes M.
Robert S.[9]
4-66-36-4
Clarke J.[16]
Napolitano S.[10]
4-66-46-3
Majchrzak K.[5]
Fanselow S.
6-16-2
Diez S.
Bourchier H.
6-26-2
R16
Fanselow S.
Polmans M.[4]
3-66-47-62
Banes M.
Beale J.
3-66-22-0
Bourchier H.
Giustino L.[13]
7-6147-65
Robert S.[9]
Li Z.
7-686-3
Majchrzak K.[5]
Soeda G.[12]
7-56-2
Diez S.
Safwat M.[8]
6-16-3
Clarke J.[16]
Basic M.[1]
6-16-3
Napolitano S.[10]
Purcell M.
6-47-63
R32
Purcell M.
Ofner S.[6]
7-636-2
Polmans M.[4]
Duckworth J.
6-43-66-4
Bourchier H.
Martinez P.[3]
6-31-67-5
Banes M.
Harris L.[2]
6-47-5
Soeda G.[12]
Oconnell C.
6-46-2
Fanselow S.
Moroni G.[14]
4-66-46-2
Robert S.[9]
Zhurbin A.
6-24-66-3
Li Z.
Moriya H.[7]
6-36-4
Majchrzak K.[5]
Sela D.
6-34-66-1
Safwat M.[8]
Grills J.
6-46-2
Diez S.
Gaio F.[11]
3-66-16-4
Giustino L.[13]
Chung Y.
6-26-3
Napolitano S.[10]
Kuhn N.
6-16-1
Basic M.[1]
Saville L.
3-67-56-3
Beale J.
Clezar G.[15]
6-26-4
Clarke J.[16]
Bega A.
6-16-4
R64
Beale J.
Mousley B.
7-6113-1
Bourchier H.
Heliovaara H.
7-653-2
Li Z.
Harris A.
7-56-746-3
Purcell M.
Perez Sanz D.
6-26-2
Oconnell C.
Wu D.
7-687-64
Fanselow S.
Yang T.
6-46-3
Bega A.
Brkic T.
6-36-2
Zhurbin A.
Kelly D.
6-46-4
Sela D.
Lamasine T.
6-756-26-1
Kuhn N.
Santillan A.
6-47-65
Banes M.
Ilkel C.
3-66-37-66
Duckworth J.
Vukic A.
6-26-3
Diez S.
Altmaier D.
1-66-36-1
Saville L.
Doumbia S.
7-56-2
Chung Y.
Samper Montana J.
7-56-1
Grills J.
Lopez Perez E.
6-26-1