Tomas Lipovsek Puches vs Martin Cuevas — Punta Del Este CH Round of 32

Punta Del Este CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 January 2019
clay
URU16
Martin Cuevas
34 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLLW
Lipovsek Puches T.
3-6 7-6 6-4
Cuevas M.
Lipovsek Puches T.
37762
Cuevas M.
66441

Tomas Lipovsek Puches defeated Martin Cuevas 3-6 7-6 6-4 in the Punta Del Este CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Martin Cuevas came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lipovsek Puches T.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Cuevas M.

Cuevas M.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Lipovsek Puches T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lipovsek Puches T.Cuevas M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
54%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
59%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
39%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
52%
59%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
48%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.5
5.3
Double faults / match·Even
4.3
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (38 vs 84). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lipovsek Puches T.Cuevas M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
6
14
Break points saved·Dominant
3
35
Break points won·Clear edge
45
22
Deciding sets·Clear edge
34
20
Tiebreaks·
—
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Monteiro T.[4]
Arguello F.[11]
3-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Arguello F.[11]
Bagnis F.[6]
6-26-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Gomez E.
7-666-3
Quarter-finals
Gomez E.
Coppejans K.[10]
6-42-66-3
Arguello F.[11]
Londero J.[2]
7-623-66-1
Bagnis F.[6]
Dellien H.[3]
7-54-66-1
Monteiro T.[4]
Quinzi G.[7]
7-57-5
R16
Londero J.[2]
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-36-1
Quinzi G.[7]
Martin A.[9]
6-46-746-3
Dellien H.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-36-3
Arguello F.[11]
Dutra Silva R.[5]
6-36-4
Bagnis F.[6]
Serdarusic N.[12]
6-06-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Lama G.
6-36-4
Coppejans K.[10]
Barrios Vera T.
6-37-5
Gomez E.
Collarini A.[15]
6-776-46-4
R32
Arguello F.[11]
Tabilo A.
6-27-63
Collarini A.[15]
Franco Descotte M.
7-57-5
Martin A.[9]
Sorgi J.
7-646-1
Londero J.[2]
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-07-65
Lipovsek Puches T.
Cuevas M.[16]
3-67-646-4
Dutra Silva R.[5]
Gonzalez A.
7-666-2
Dellien H.[3]
Olivo R.
6-33-67-5
Ficovich J.
Coria F.[14]
7-57-5
Serdarusic N.[12]
Villanueva G.
7-634-66-4
Bagnis F.[6]
Muller A.
6-16-7106-4
Quinzi G.[7]
Varillas J.
6-737-6116-4
Lama G.
Cachin P.[13]
7-656-1
Monteiro T.[4]
Souza J.
7-666-2
Barrios Vera T.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-46-4
Coppejans K.[10]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-16-4
Gomez E.
Andreozzi G.[1]
7-637-5
R64
Boluda Purkiss C.
Basso A.
4-66-37-62
Lipovsek Puches T.
Arconada J.
6-24-67-5
Tabilo A.
Gille S.
6-26-4
Gonzalez A.
Galarza J.
7-56-3
Ficovich J.
Llanes F.
6-46-3
Villanueva G.
Seyboth Wild T.
1-66-46-3
Muller A.
Menezes J.
6-26-1
Olivo R.
Casanova H.
6-47-65
Souza J.
Brown P.
6-26-4
Gomez E.
Durasovic V.
6-36-2
Varillas J.
Eriksson M.
6-27-63
Sorgi J.
Ornago F.
6-46-4
Lama G.
Gutierrez O.
7-626-2
Barrios Vera T.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-27-5
Ugo Carabelli C.
Zukas M.
7-642-66-0
Franco Descotte M.
Sakamoto P.
6-46-1