Marcos Baghdatis vs Sergiy Stakhovsky — Rennes CH Round of 16

Rennes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CYP6
Marcos Baghdatis
41 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 January 2019
hard
UKR9
Sergiy Stakhovsky
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
Baghdatis M.
6-4 7-6
Stakhovsky S.
Baghdatis M.
6772
Stakhovsky S.
4620

Marcos Baghdatis defeated Sergiy Stakhovsky 6-4 7-6 in the Rennes CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Sergiy Stakhovsky came in defending last year's round of 32, but Marcos Baghdatis had been the form player, winning 5 of their last 8 on hard. Marcos Baghdatis extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-10-01TokyoR32hardMarcos Baghdatis7-6(3) 7-5
2010-08-22New HavenQFhardSergiy Stakhovsky5-7 6-1 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Baghdatis M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Stakhovsky S.

Stakhovsky S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Baghdatis M.

Serve advantage — Baghdatis M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Baghdatis M.Stakhovsky S.
1st serve in·Even
56%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.5
7.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (24 vs 140). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Baghdatis M.Stakhovsky S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
40
Break points saved·Even
92
88
Break points won·Dominant
36
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
64
57
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
81
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Berankis R.[4]
Hoang A.[14]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Hoang A.[14]
Moutet C.[15]
4-67-646-4
Berankis R.[4]
Maden Y.[7]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Maden Y.[7]
Paire B.[2]
6-42-1
Berankis R.[4]
Ymer E.[5]
6-46-4
Hoang A.[14]
Baghdatis M.[6]
2-67-656-4
Moutet C.[15]
Halys Q.[8]
6-47-5
R16
Moutet C.[15]
Karatsev A.
6-26-3
Baghdatis M.[6]
Stakhovsky S.[9]
6-47-62
Hoang A.[14]
Rodionov J.
7-632-66-4
Paire B.[2]
Rosol L.[13]
7-646-2
Maden Y.[7]
Arnaboldi A.
6-47-62
Ymer E.[5]
Mertens Y.
6-36-4
Halys Q.[8]
Brancaccio R.
6-746-46-4
Berankis R.[4]
Caruso S.[16]
6-36-2
R32
Berankis R.[4]
Guinard M.
6-26-4
Caruso S.[16]
Galovic V.
4-66-36-3
Brancaccio R.
Novak D.[11]
6-21-67-65
Moutet C.[15]
Otte O.
6-46-4
Ymer E.[5]
Reboul F.
6-16-1
Stakhovsky S.[9]
Furness E.
4-66-37-67
Rosol L.[13]
Barrere G.
3-67-656-3
Arnaboldi A.
Lestienne C.[12]
4-67-636-3
Mertens Y.
Karlovskiy E.
6-37-62
Karatsev A.
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
6-46-4
Baghdatis M.[6]
Gombos N.
4-66-06-1
Rodionov J.
Mannarino A.[1]
6-44-66-3
Paire B.[2]
Ward J.
6-27-65
Maden Y.[7]
Bublik A.
7-636-1
Halys Q.[8]
Masur D.
6-36-3
Hoang A.[14]
Kolar Z.
6-36-4
R64
Rodionov J.
De Bakker T.
7-627-65
Brancaccio R.
Jacq G.
7-51-0
Ward J.
Hemery C.
7-56-796-4
Barrere G.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-37-61
Karatsev A.
Safiullin R.
6-04-0
Gombos N.
Taberner C.
6-04-66-1
Reboul F.
Gimeno Traver D.
7-56-3
Karlovskiy E.
Molleker R.
6-46-2
Bublik A.
Gaston H.
7-53-66-3
Guinard M.
Kuzmanov D.
3-66-36-4
Galovic V.
Janvier M.
6-46-756-3
Masur D.
Milojevic N.
7-55-76-1
Otte O.
Moraing M.
7-656-0
Kolar Z.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-1
Furness E.
Baldi F.
6-46-4
Arnaboldi A.
Gerasimov E.
6-33-66-1