Facundo Arguello vs Facundo Bagnis — Punta Del Este CH Semi-final

Punta Del Este CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ARG11
Facundo Arguello
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 January 2019
clay
ARG6
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Arguello F.
6-2 6-2
Bagnis F.
Arguello F.
662
Bagnis F.
220

Facundo Arguello defeated Facundo Bagnis 6-2 6-2 in the Punta Del Este CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Facundo Bagnis came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Facundo Arguello claimed a first win over Facundo Bagnis in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-02-22Sao PauloQ2clayFacundo Bagnis6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Arguello F.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving73% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Arguello F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Arguello F.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
53%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.2
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (36 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Arguello F.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
6
54
Break points saved·Dominant
34
92
Break points won·Slight edge
24
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
10
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Monteiro T.[4]
Arguello F.[11]
3-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Arguello F.[11]
Bagnis F.[6]
6-26-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Gomez E.
7-666-3
Quarter-finals
Gomez E.
Coppejans K.[10]
6-42-66-3
Arguello F.[11]
Londero J.[2]
7-623-66-1
Bagnis F.[6]
Dellien H.[3]
7-54-66-1
Monteiro T.[4]
Quinzi G.[7]
7-57-5
R16
Londero J.[2]
Lipovsek Puches T.
6-36-1
Quinzi G.[7]
Martin A.[9]
6-46-746-3
Dellien H.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-36-3
Arguello F.[11]
Dutra Silva R.[5]
6-36-4
Bagnis F.[6]
Serdarusic N.[12]
6-06-2
Monteiro T.[4]
Lama G.
6-36-4
Coppejans K.[10]
Barrios Vera T.
6-37-5
Gomez E.
Collarini A.[15]
6-776-46-4
R32
Arguello F.[11]
Tabilo A.
6-27-63
Collarini A.[15]
Franco Descotte M.
7-57-5
Martin A.[9]
Sorgi J.
7-646-1
Londero J.[2]
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-07-65
Lipovsek Puches T.
Cuevas M.[16]
3-67-646-4
Dutra Silva R.[5]
Gonzalez A.
7-666-2
Dellien H.[3]
Olivo R.
6-33-67-5
Ficovich J.
Coria F.[14]
7-57-5
Serdarusic N.[12]
Villanueva G.
7-634-66-4
Bagnis F.[6]
Muller A.
6-16-7106-4
Quinzi G.[7]
Varillas J.
6-737-6116-4
Lama G.
Cachin P.[13]
7-656-1
Monteiro T.[4]
Souza J.
7-666-2
Barrios Vera T.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-46-4
Coppejans K.[10]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-16-4
Gomez E.
Andreozzi G.[1]
7-637-5
R64
Boluda Purkiss C.
Basso A.
4-66-37-62
Lipovsek Puches T.
Arconada J.
6-24-67-5
Tabilo A.
Gille S.
6-26-4
Gonzalez A.
Galarza J.
7-56-3
Ficovich J.
Llanes F.
6-46-3
Villanueva G.
Seyboth Wild T.
1-66-46-3
Muller A.
Menezes J.
6-26-1
Olivo R.
Casanova H.
6-47-65
Souza J.
Brown P.
6-26-4
Gomez E.
Durasovic V.
6-36-2
Varillas J.
Eriksson M.
6-27-63
Sorgi J.
Ornago F.
6-46-4
Lama G.
Gutierrez O.
7-626-2
Barrios Vera T.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-27-5
Ugo Carabelli C.
Zukas M.
7-642-66-0
Franco Descotte M.
Sakamoto P.
6-46-1