Hubert Hurkacz vs Tak Khunn Wang — Canberra CH Round of 16

Canberra CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Hubert Hurkacz
POL2
Hubert Hurkacz
#68ATP
1798ELO
1727Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$20MCAREER
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 January 2019
hard
FRA15
Tak Khunn Wang
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWLWLL
Hurkacz H.
7-6 6-4
Wang T.
Hurkacz H.
7762
Wang T.
6540

Hubert Hurkacz defeated Tak Khunn Wang 7-6 6-4 in the Canberra CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hurkacz H.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Wang T.

Wang T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Hurkacz H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Hurkacz H.Wang T.
67
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Hurkacz H.Wang T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
57%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
79%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
68%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.9
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hurkacz H.Wang T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
39
Break points saved·Dominant
100
59
Break points won·Even
40
44
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
60
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Hurkacz H.Wang T.
Freshness·
81
—

Hurkacz H.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Hurkacz H.[2]
Ivashka I.[4]
6-44-66-2
Semi-finals
Ivashka I.[4]
Olivo R.[14]
6-16-3
Hurkacz H.[2]
Vesely J.[3]
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Olivo R.[14]
Doumbia S.
6-33-66-3
Hurkacz H.[2]
Lamasine T.[11]
7-626-4
Vesely J.[3]
Mousley B.[12]
7-636-3
Ivashka I.[4]
Benchetrit E.[7]
6-06-4
R16
Benchetrit E.[7]
Harris A.
7-637-65
Vesely J.[3]
Grenier H.[16]
7-56-2
Ivashka I.[4]
Barrios Vera T.
6-16-2
Hurkacz H.[2]
Wang T.[15]
7-656-4
Mousley B.[12]
Klein B.
6-46-7117-5
Doumbia S.
Brkic T.[9]
6-26-1
Olivo R.[14]
Bourchier H.
6-17-5
Lamasine T.[11]
Li Z.[8]
6-36-4
R32
Benchetrit E.[7]
Fancutt T.
7-627-64
Mousley B.[12]
Chazal M.
5-77-647-61
Wang T.[15]
Romios M.
7-656-0
Lamasine T.[11]
Look M.
6-26-2
Vesely J.[3]
Bortolotti M.
6-36-3
Ivashka I.[4]
Frawley J.
4-66-17-64
Li Z.[8]
Huesler M.
6-27-67
Grenier H.[16]
Simon T.
6-46-766-4
Harris A.
Wu D.[10]
6-47-5
Barrios Vera T.
Smith R.[13]
7-636-3
Doumbia S.
Polmans M.[5]
6-36-4
Brkic T.[9]
Nys H.
6-24-67-5
Olivo R.[14]
Verbeek S.
4-66-47-64
Bourchier H.
Carballes Baena R.[1]
7-641-66-3
Hurkacz H.[2]
Tseng C.
6-46-4
Klein B.
Chung Y.[6]
7-626-756-0
R64
Fancutt T.
Xia Z.
6-36-2
Frawley J.
Barclay D.
6-46-776-2
Look M.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-3
Romios M.
Gille S.
6-37-60
Tseng C.
Martin F.
6-37-65
Huesler M.
Lo C.
7-56-2
Bortolotti M.
Bosancic T.
6-26-2
Simon T.
Evans T.
6-36-2
Chazal M.
Addison A.
6-46-3
Klein B.
Kelly D.
6-46-4
Harris A.
Zhurbin A.
7-53-66-3
Barrios Vera T.
Grills J.
6-36-3
Doumbia S.
Sinclair C.
6-36-4
Nys H.
Vuradin L.
6-36-1
Verbeek S.
Gao X.
1-67-676-3
Bourchier H.
He Y.
6-42-66-1