Elliot Benchetrit vs Thomas Fancutt — Canberra CH Round of 32

Canberra CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
MAR7
Elliot Benchetrit
#1360ATP
27 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 January 2019
hard
Thomas Fancutt
AUS
Thomas Fancutt
#851ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLW
Benchetrit E.
7-6 7-6
Fancutt T.
Benchetrit E.
77772
Fancutt T.
62640

Elliot Benchetrit defeated Thomas Fancutt 7-6 7-6 in the Canberra CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Thomas Fancutt came in ranked #851, defending last year's round of 32, but Elliot Benchetrit had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 5 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Benchetrit E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Fancutt T.

Fancutt T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Benchetrit E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Benchetrit E.Fancutt T.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
8.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (159 vs 62). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Benchetrit E.Fancutt T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
29
24
Break points saved·Even
59
62
Break points won·Even
14
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
32
56
Tiebreaks·Dominant
90
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Benchetrit E.Fancutt T.
Freshness·
—
61

Fancutt T.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Hurkacz H.[2]
Ivashka I.[4]
6-44-66-2
Semi-finals
Ivashka I.[4]
Olivo R.[14]
6-16-3
Hurkacz H.[2]
Vesely J.[3]
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Olivo R.[14]
Doumbia S.
6-33-66-3
Hurkacz H.[2]
Lamasine T.[11]
7-626-4
Vesely J.[3]
Mousley B.[12]
7-636-3
Ivashka I.[4]
Benchetrit E.[7]
6-06-4
R16
Benchetrit E.[7]
Harris A.
7-637-65
Vesely J.[3]
Grenier H.[16]
7-56-2
Ivashka I.[4]
Barrios Vera T.
6-16-2
Hurkacz H.[2]
Wang T.[15]
7-656-4
Mousley B.[12]
Klein B.
6-46-7117-5
Doumbia S.
Brkic T.[9]
6-26-1
Olivo R.[14]
Bourchier H.
6-17-5
Lamasine T.[11]
Li Z.[8]
6-36-4
R32
Benchetrit E.[7]
Fancutt T.
7-627-64
Mousley B.[12]
Chazal M.
5-77-647-61
Wang T.[15]
Romios M.
7-656-0
Lamasine T.[11]
Look M.
6-26-2
Vesely J.[3]
Bortolotti M.
6-36-3
Ivashka I.[4]
Frawley J.
4-66-17-64
Li Z.[8]
Huesler M.
6-27-67
Grenier H.[16]
Simon T.
6-46-766-4
Harris A.
Wu D.[10]
6-47-5
Barrios Vera T.
Smith R.[13]
7-636-3
Doumbia S.
Polmans M.[5]
6-36-4
Brkic T.[9]
Nys H.
6-24-67-5
Olivo R.[14]
Verbeek S.
4-66-47-64
Bourchier H.
Carballes Baena R.[1]
7-641-66-3
Hurkacz H.[2]
Tseng C.
6-46-4
Klein B.
Chung Y.[6]
7-626-756-0
R64
Fancutt T.
Xia Z.
6-36-2
Frawley J.
Barclay D.
6-46-776-2
Look M.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-3
Romios M.
Gille S.
6-37-60
Tseng C.
Martin F.
6-37-65
Huesler M.
Lo C.
7-56-2
Bortolotti M.
Bosancic T.
6-26-2
Simon T.
Evans T.
6-36-2
Chazal M.
Addison A.
6-46-3
Klein B.
Kelly D.
6-46-4
Harris A.
Zhurbin A.
7-53-66-3
Barrios Vera T.
Grills J.
6-36-3
Doumbia S.
Sinclair C.
6-36-4
Nys H.
Vuradin L.
6-36-1
Verbeek S.
Gao X.
1-67-676-3
Bourchier H.
He Y.
6-42-66-1