Monica Puig vs Bethanie Mattek Sands — Auckland Round of 32
Auckland · WTA · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 December 2018
hard
Puig M.6-3 6-2
Mattek Sands B.
Puig M.
662
Mattek Sands B.
320
Monica Puig defeated Bethanie Mattek Sands 6-3 6-2 in the Auckland round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Bethanie Mattek Sands came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, but Monica Puig had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 7 on hard. Monica Puig claimed a first win over Bethanie Mattek Sands in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.
Key context
- Match story: Monica Puig dropped just 5 games past Bethanie Mattek Sands.
Head to head
0–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-07-29 | Carlsbad | R32 | hard | Bethanie Mattek Sands | 2-6 6-1 6-2 |
| 2013-03-18 | Miami | R128 | hard | Bethanie Mattek Sands | 6-4 7-5 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Puig M.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
55%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.5
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (95 vs 54). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
36
18
Break points saved·Slight edge
63
52
Break points won·Even
62
61
Deciding sets·Dominant
55
17
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
30
52
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 74%
Draw
Semi-finals
Goerges J.[2]
Hsieh S.
6-16-4
Wozniacki C.[1]
Vickery S.
6-46-4
Goerges J.[2]
Hruncakova V.
6-17-66
Andreescu B.
Hsieh S.[3]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Goerges J.[2]
Hercog P.
6-46-4
Hsieh S.
Strycova B.[3]
0-66-26-2
Vickery S.
Radwanska A.[4]
6-26-2
Wozniacki C.[1]
Kenin S.
4-66-26-4
Goerges J.[2]
Bouchard E.
3-66-37-66
Hruncakova V.
Anisimova A.
6-32-66-4
Hsieh S.[3]
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-36-2
Andreescu B.
Williams V.[6]
6-716-16-3
R16
Goerges J.[2]
Hruncakova V.
6-46-0
Hercog P.
Flipkens K.
6-46-2
Vickery S.
Cepede Royg V.
6-26-4
Radwanska A.[4]
Townsend T.
6-37-5
Kenin S.
Lepchenko V.
6-47-66
Wozniacki C.[1]
Martic P.
6-26-2
Hsieh S.
Bonaventure Y.
6-46-3
Strycova B.[3]
Larsson J.
6-16-736-2
Anisimova A.
Strycova B.[5]
6-36-3
Sorribes Tormo S.
Flipkens K.[7]
6-41-66-1
Williams V.[6]
Davis L.
6-46-3
Andreescu B.
Wozniacki C.[1]
6-46-4
Goerges J.[2]
Barthel M.
6-46-4
Bouchard E.
Schoofs B.
6-756-46-4
Hruncakova V.
Kenin S.
7-55-76-3
Hsieh S.[3]
Puig M.
6-17-63
R32
Larsson J.
Nara K.
7-656-3
Goerges J.[2]
Puig M.
6-44-66-2
Cepede Royg V.
Arruabarrena L.
6-36-3
Lepchenko V.
Barthel M.[7]
6-26-2
Radwanska A.[4]
Haddad Maia B.
6-24-66-2
Strycova B.[3]
Errani S.
6-46-736-4
Hruncakova V.
Lewis J.
6-46-3
Hercog P.
Van Uytvanck A.
6-47-5
Flipkens K.
Vekic D.[8]
7-653-66-4
Hsieh S.
Hibino N.
6-06-3
Bonaventure Y.
Putintseva Y.[6]
6-36-3
Vickery S.
Davis L.[5]
6-16-2
Townsend T.
Mchale C.
1-66-46-4
Kenin S.
Fett J.
6-46-4
Martic P.
Vondrousova M.
7-626-3
Wozniacki C.[1]
Brengle M.
6-36-0
Goerges J.[2]
Larsson J.
6-06-4
Kenin S.
Martic P.[4]
7-52-66-2
Hruncakova V.
Zidansek T.
6-27-63
Strycova B.[5]
Townsend T.
6-26-756-3
Flipkens K.[7]
Vickery S.
6-26-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Voegele S.
7-56-3
Puig M.
Mattek Sands B.
6-36-2
Hsieh S.[3]
Hercog P.
6-26-3
Williams V.[6]
Azarenka V.
6-31-66-3
Andreescu B.
Babos T.
6-47-66
Schoofs B.
Van Uytvanck A.[8]
3-4
Anisimova A.
Cepelova J.
6-23-0
Wozniacki C.[1]
Siegemund L.
6-36-2
Davis L.
Arruabarrena L.
6-26-2
Barthel M.
Soler Espinosa S.
6-27-61
Bouchard E.
Brengle M.
6-36-3