Radu Albot vs Sumit Nagal — Pune CH Round of 32

Pune CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Radu Albot
MDA1
Radu Albot
#490ATP
1453ELO
1429Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 November 2018
hard
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
Albot R.
7-5 6-2
Nagal S.
Albot R.
762
Nagal S.
520

Radu Albot defeated Sumit Nagal 7-5 6-2 in the Pune CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Sumit Nagal came in ranked #241, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Radu Albot closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Albot R.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Albot R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Albot R.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Albot R.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
46
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
85
69
Break points won·Clear edge
19
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
76
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Albot R.Nagal S.
Freshness·Even
93
96

Albot R.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ymer E.[3]
Gunneswaran P.[4]
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Ymer E.[3]
Schnur B.
6-33-66-3
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Albot R.[1]
1-66-46-4
Quarter-finals
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Nedovyesov A.
6-46-4
Schnur B.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-662-67-5
Ymer E.[3]
Fanselow S.
5-76-36-4
Albot R.[1]
Mukund S.
6-34-66-1
R16
Fanselow S.
Purcell M.
6-26-1
Schnur B.
Kadhe A.
7-56-2
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Gerch L.
6-16-3
Albot R.[1]
Banes M.
6-36-1
Mukund S.
Clarke J.[6]
5-76-44-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Kuhn N.
7-57-5
Ymer E.[3]
Masur D.
6-37-64
Nedovyesov A.
Patael B.
7-56-4
R32
Kadhe A.
Ramanathan R.[2]
6-36-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Hassan B.
6-16-2
Ymer E.[3]
Sureshkumar M.
6-46-1
Purcell M.
Ward J.[8]
6-46-4
Nedovyesov A.
Polmans M.[5]
6-26-4
Patael B.
Petrovic D.
5-76-46-4
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Yang T.
6-46-4
Clarke J.[6]
Ilkel C.
6-36-736-2
Banes M.
Vilardo F.
3-66-46-1
Albot R.[1]
Nagal S.
7-56-2
Gerch L.
Altamirano C.
6-36-1
Schnur B.
Goveas A.
6-36-4
Kuhn N.
Martin A.[7]
6-26-3
Fanselow S.
Griekspoor S.
3-66-36-4
Mukund S.
Myneni S.
6-47-61
Masur D.
Sels J.
6-46-4