Cem Ilkel vs Marco Trungelliti — Bengaluru CH Round of 32

Bengaluru CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 November 2018
hard
Marco Trungelliti
ARG2
Marco Trungelliti
#99ATP
1627ELO
1496Hard ELO
$395kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLWLWW
Ilkel C.
6-2 3-6 7-6
Trungelliti M.
Ilkel C.
63772
Trungelliti M.
26631

Cem Ilkel defeated Marco Trungelliti 6-2 3-6 7-6 in the Bengaluru CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Marco Trungelliti came in ranked #99.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Trungelliti M.

Trungelliti M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Trungelliti M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Trungelliti M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
50
Break points saved·Dominant
49
87
Break points won·Clear edge
3
24
Deciding sets·Clear edge
70
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ilkel C.Trungelliti M.
Freshness·
—
89

Trungelliti M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Myneni S.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Schnur B.
6-46-1
Myneni S.
Nedovyesov A.
4-66-46-4
Quarter-finals
Schnur B.
Ilkel C.
6-36-4
Nedovyesov A.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-2
Myneni S.
Nagal S.
6-46-4
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Mukund S.
0-0
R16
Mukund S.
Kavcic B.
7-623-1
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Fanselow S.
4-66-47-5
Schnur B.
Halys Q.[6]
6-47-63
Nedovyesov A.
Polmans M.[5]
6-26-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Masur D.
5-76-46-2
Ilkel C.
Bergs Z.
7-56-3
Myneni S.
Hossam Y.
6-13-66-1
Nagal S.
Ward J.
6-37-64
R32
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Nedelko I.
6-26-2
Fanselow S.
Piros Z.
7-636-4
Kavcic B.
Peliwo F.[8]
6-26-0
Polmans M.[5]
Banes M.
1-66-46-2
Nedovyesov A.
Griekspoor S.
6-36-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Petrovic D.
6-33-66-4
Ward J.
Yang T.
7-646-4
Mukund S.
Altamirano C.
7-666-3
Ilkel C.
Trungelliti M.[2]
6-23-67-63
Hossam Y.
Albot R.[1]
2-66-26-2
Schnur B.
Purcell M.
6-47-63
Myneni S.
Kalyanpur A.
6-37-63
Nagal S.
Clarke J.[7]
6-47-5
Masur D.
Ymer E.[3]
6-47-5
Halys Q.[6]
Prabodh S.
6-36-1
Bergs Z.
Krawietz K.
6-16-2