Cem Ilkel vs Zizou Bergs — Bengaluru CH Round of 16

Bengaluru CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 November 2018
hard
Zizou Bergs
BEL
Zizou Bergs
#37ATP
1808ELO
1757Hard ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
Ilkel C.
7-5 6-3
Bergs Z.
Ilkel C.
762
Bergs Z.
530

Cem Ilkel defeated Zizou Bergs 7-5 6-3 in the Bengaluru CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #37.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Bergs Z.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve advantage — Bergs Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ilkel C.Bergs Z.
—
Serve
25
—
Return
40

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Bergs Z.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
6.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Bergs Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
69
Break points saved·Dominant
49
95
Break points won·Clear edge
3
21
Deciding sets·Clear edge
70
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ilkel C.Bergs Z.
Freshness·
—
70

Bergs Z.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 54 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Myneni S.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Schnur B.
6-46-1
Myneni S.
Nedovyesov A.
4-66-46-4
Quarter-finals
Schnur B.
Ilkel C.
6-36-4
Nedovyesov A.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-2
Myneni S.
Nagal S.
6-46-4
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Mukund S.
0-0
R16
Mukund S.
Kavcic B.
7-623-1
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Fanselow S.
4-66-47-5
Schnur B.
Halys Q.[6]
6-47-63
Nedovyesov A.
Polmans M.[5]
6-26-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Masur D.
5-76-46-2
Ilkel C.
Bergs Z.
7-56-3
Myneni S.
Hossam Y.
6-13-66-1
Nagal S.
Ward J.
6-37-64
R32
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Nedelko I.
6-26-2
Fanselow S.
Piros Z.
7-636-4
Kavcic B.
Peliwo F.[8]
6-26-0
Polmans M.[5]
Banes M.
1-66-46-2
Nedovyesov A.
Griekspoor S.
6-36-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Petrovic D.
6-33-66-4
Ward J.
Yang T.
7-646-4
Mukund S.
Altamirano C.
7-666-3
Ilkel C.
Trungelliti M.[2]
6-23-67-63
Hossam Y.
Albot R.[1]
2-66-26-2
Schnur B.
Purcell M.
6-47-63
Myneni S.
Kalyanpur A.
6-37-63
Nagal S.
Clarke J.[7]
6-47-5
Masur D.
Ymer E.[3]
6-47-5
Halys Q.[6]
Prabodh S.
6-36-1
Bergs Z.
Krawietz K.
6-16-2