Dimitar Kuzmanov vs Thiago Seyboth Wild — Montevideo CH Round of 32

Montevideo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Dimitar Kuzmanov
BUL
Dimitar Kuzmanov
#394ATP
1431ELO
1394Clay ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 November 2018
clay
Thiago Seyboth Wild
BRA
Thiago Seyboth Wild
#284ATP
1532ELO
1516Clay ELO
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
Kuzmanov D.
6-2 4-6 6-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Kuzmanov D.
6462
Seyboth Wild T.
2621

Dimitar Kuzmanov defeated Thiago Seyboth Wild 6-2 4-6 6-2 in the Montevideo CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kuzmanov D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Seyboth Wild T.

Seyboth Wild T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kuzmanov D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kuzmanov D.Seyboth Wild T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.6
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kuzmanov D.Seyboth Wild T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
17
27
Break points saved·Dominant
61
93
Break points won·Slight edge
31
25
Deciding sets·Slight edge
13
20
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
29
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kuzmanov D.Seyboth Wild T.
Freshness·Dominant
57
90

Kuzmanov D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 71 games (7d) · Seyboth Wild T.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Pella G.[2]
Berlocq C.
6-33-66-1
Semi-finals
Pella G.[2]
Sousa P.
2-66-36-4
Berlocq C.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Sousa P.
Gimeno Traver D.
3-67-56-1
Vilella Martinez M.
Cuevas M.
6-36-4
Pella G.[2]
Giustino L.
6-13-2
Berlocq C.
Arguello F.
6-33-67-5
R16
Vilella Martinez M.
Kuzmanov D.
6-27-63
Giustino L.
Cachin P.
6-16-3
Sousa P.
Andreozzi G.[3]
6-16-3
Berlocq C.
Lorenzi P.[7]
3-66-27-5
Arguello F.
Andujar P.[4]
7-647-5
Pella G.[2]
Krstin P.
1-66-37-5
Cuevas M.
Monteiro T.[5]
4-67-57-5
Gimeno Traver D.
Dellien H.[6]
7-57-5
R32
Cuevas M.
Taberner C.
7-677-65
Giustino L.
Bellucci T.
6-36-3
Cachin P.
Londero J.[8]
5-76-16-2
Andreozzi G.[3]
Galarza J.
1-67-56-3
Sousa P.
Clezar G.
6-16-2
Lorenzi P.[7]
Coria F.
3-66-07-62
Berlocq C.
Bagnis F.
6-26-0
Arguello F.
De Greef A.
5-76-36-3
Andujar P.[4]
Domingues J.
6-06-3
Monteiro T.[5]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-27-5
Kuzmanov D.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-24-66-2
Krstin P.
Gaio F.
7-657-5
Pella G.[2]
Cid R.
6-46-1
Vilella Martinez M.
Cuevas P.[1]
6-26-2
Dellien H.[6]
Llanes F.
6-26-3
Gimeno Traver D.
Elias G.
6-46-1