Egor Gerasimov vs Lukas Lacko — Bratislava CH Round of 16

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
BLR
Egor Gerasimov
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 November 2018
hard
SVK1
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Gerasimov E.
6-3 6-3
Lacko L.
Gerasimov E.
662
Lacko L.
330

Egor Gerasimov defeated Lukas Lacko 6-3 6-3 in the Bratislava CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Lukas Lacko came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending the title. Egor Gerasimov claimed a first win over Lukas Lacko in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-06-14HalleQ1grassLukas Lacko6-4 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Gerasimov E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gerasimov E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gerasimov E.Lacko L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.3
7.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 181). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gerasimov E.Lacko L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
44
26
Break points saved·Even
88
86
Break points won·Even
8
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
33
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
40
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bublik A.
Rosol L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Bublik A.
Bachinger M.
7-57-64
Rosol L.
Novak D.
7-57-61
Quarter-finals
Bublik A.
Stakhovsky S.
6-37-65
Novak D.
Ofner S.
6-11-66-3
Rosol L.
Gerasimov E.
6-756-36-4
Bachinger M.
Donskoy E.[2]
6-47-66
R16
Bachinger M.
Ramanathan R.[6]
6-33-66-2
Novak D.
Baghdatis M.[7]
6-46-1
Ofner S.
Garcia Lopez G.[4]
7-56-4
Gerasimov E.
Lacko L.[1]
6-36-3
Donskoy E.[2]
Rodionov J.
6-746-47-65
Rosol L.
Bemelmans R.[8]
4-66-37-62
Stakhovsky S.
Gombos N.
6-766-46-2
Bublik A.
Sonego L.[3]
6-46-2
R32
Rodionov J.
Ignatik U.
2-67-617-66
Bachinger M.
Klein L.
6-47-66
Ramanathan R.[6]
Gutierrez Ferrol S.
6-37-5
Sonego L.[3]
Donati M.
6-36-2
Novak D.
Molcan A.
6-46-4
Gerasimov E.
Masur D.
6-26-2
Lacko L.[1]
Robert S.
4-66-47-5
Bublik A.
Martin A.
2-66-37-5
Gombos N.
Liska T.
6-26-1
Donskoy E.[2]
Zopp J.
7-646-2
Stakhovsky S.
Trungelliti M.[5]
6-26-4
Baghdatis M.[7]
Horansky F.
6-36-4
Garcia Lopez G.[4]
Brands D.
7-656-4
Bemelmans R.[8]
Molleker R.
6-46-3
Rosol L.
Haerteis J.
6-36-3
Ofner S.
Arnaboldi A.
6-7116-36-4