Patrick Kypson vs Jack Draper — Knoxville CH Qualifying Round 1

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Patrick Kypson
USA
Patrick Kypson
#112ATP
1641ELO
1611Hard ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 November 2018
hard
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
Kypson P.
6-4 6-2
Draper J.
Kypson P.
662
Draper J.
420

Patrick Kypson defeated Jack Draper 6-4 6-2 in the Knoxville CH qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Patrick Kypson came in ranked #112.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kypson P.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Draper J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kypson P.Draper J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
65%
66%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.2
8.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kypson P.Draper J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
42
88
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
99
Break points won·Dominant
41
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
96
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
76
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kypson P.Draper J.
Freshness·Slight edge
94
100

Kypson P.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Draper J.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q3
Ymer M.[3]
Brouwer G.
6-46-4
Redlicki M.
Gomez Gb42 A.
7-57-65
Gomez E.[6]
Yevseyev D.[4]
6-46-2
Song E.
Shane R.
7-656-4
Q2
Song E.
Kypson P.
6-43-66-3
Brouwer G.
Schneider R.
7-56-3
Ymer M.[3]
Withrow J.
6-26-3
Gomez Gb42 A.
Sels J.[2]
7-656-4
Gomez E.[6]
Korda S.
6-46-4
Yevseyev D.[4]
Lammons N.
6-26-1
Redlicki M.
Gonzalez A.
7-633-67-5
Shane R.
Krainik P.
6-16-3
Q1
Lammons N.
Nguyen D.
6-43-66-4
Redlicki M.
Fawcett T.
4-66-16-4
Schneider R.
King K.[5]
7-646-4
Brouwer G.
Lenz J.
6-36-4
Yevseyev D.[4]
Hiltzik J.
7-667-5
Withrow J.
Halebian A.
7-636-4
Gomez Gb42 A.
Avidzba A.
7-656-4
Gomez E.[6]
Scholtz N.
6-36-4
Ymer M.[3]
Torpegaard M.
7-657-5
Gonzalez A.
Giron M.[8]
7-606-2
Sels J.[2]
Harper P.
6-16-4
Song E.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-43-66-3
Kypson P.
Draper J.
6-46-2
Shane R.
Choinski J.[1]
3-66-17-65