Daniel Gimeno Traver vs Hugo Dellien — Montevideo CH Round of 16

Montevideo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ESP
Daniel Gimeno Traver
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 November 2018
clay
Hugo Dellien
BOL6
Hugo Dellien
#144ATP
1637ELO
1624Clay ELO
$217kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLLLLL
Gimeno Traver D.
7-5 7-5
Dellien H.
Gimeno Traver D.
772
Dellien H.
550

Daniel Gimeno Traver defeated Hugo Dellien 7-5 7-5 in the Montevideo CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Hugo Dellien came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gimeno Traver D.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Dellien H.

Dellien H.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Gimeno Traver D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gimeno Traver D.Dellien H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
71%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
56%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
61%
Aces / match·Even
1.8
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.2
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (107 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gimeno Traver D.Dellien H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
15
61
Break points saved·Dominant
50
89
Break points won·Even
30
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
20
47

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gimeno Traver D.Dellien H.
Freshness·
—
51

Dellien H.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 126 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Pella G.[2]
Berlocq C.
6-33-66-1
Semi-finals
Pella G.[2]
Sousa P.
2-66-36-4
Berlocq C.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Sousa P.
Gimeno Traver D.
3-67-56-1
Vilella Martinez M.
Cuevas M.
6-36-4
Pella G.[2]
Giustino L.
6-13-2
Berlocq C.
Arguello F.
6-33-67-5
R16
Vilella Martinez M.
Kuzmanov D.
6-27-63
Giustino L.
Cachin P.
6-16-3
Sousa P.
Andreozzi G.[3]
6-16-3
Berlocq C.
Lorenzi P.[7]
3-66-27-5
Arguello F.
Andujar P.[4]
7-647-5
Pella G.[2]
Krstin P.
1-66-37-5
Cuevas M.
Monteiro T.[5]
4-67-57-5
Gimeno Traver D.
Dellien H.[6]
7-57-5
R32
Cuevas M.
Taberner C.
7-677-65
Giustino L.
Bellucci T.
6-36-3
Cachin P.
Londero J.[8]
5-76-16-2
Andreozzi G.[3]
Galarza J.
1-67-56-3
Sousa P.
Clezar G.
6-16-2
Lorenzi P.[7]
Coria F.
3-66-07-62
Berlocq C.
Bagnis F.
6-26-0
Arguello F.
De Greef A.
5-76-36-3
Andujar P.[4]
Domingues J.
6-06-3
Monteiro T.[5]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-27-5
Kuzmanov D.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-24-66-2
Krstin P.
Gaio F.
7-657-5
Pella G.[2]
Cid R.
6-46-1
Vilella Martinez M.
Cuevas P.[1]
6-26-2
Dellien H.[6]
Llanes F.
6-26-3
Gimeno Traver D.
Elias G.
6-46-1