Pedro Cachin vs Juan Ignacio Londero — Montevideo CH Round of 32

Montevideo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG
Pedro Cachin
#1328ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 November 2018
clay
ARG8
Juan Ignacio Londero
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWWL
Cachin P.
5-7 6-1 6-2
Londero J.
Cachin P.
5662
Londero J.
7121

Pedro Cachin defeated Juan Ignacio Londero 5-7 6-1 6-2 in the Montevideo CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Juan Ignacio Londero came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 32. Pedro Cachin claimed a first win over Juan Ignacio Londero in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-03CordobaR16clayJuan Ignacio Londero6-3 6-3
2019-02-04CordobaQFclayJuan Ignacio Londero6-4 7-6(3)

Serve vs return

This season
Cachin P.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Londero J.

Londero J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Cachin P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cachin P.Londero J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
3.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cachin P.Londero J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
22
27
Break points saved·Slight edge
77
82
Break points won·Slight edge
21
30
Deciding sets·Clear edge
11
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
46
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Pella G.[2]
Berlocq C.
6-33-66-1
Semi-finals
Pella G.[2]
Sousa P.
2-66-36-4
Berlocq C.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Sousa P.
Gimeno Traver D.
3-67-56-1
Vilella Martinez M.
Cuevas M.
6-36-4
Pella G.[2]
Giustino L.
6-13-2
Berlocq C.
Arguello F.
6-33-67-5
R16
Vilella Martinez M.
Kuzmanov D.
6-27-63
Giustino L.
Cachin P.
6-16-3
Sousa P.
Andreozzi G.[3]
6-16-3
Berlocq C.
Lorenzi P.[7]
3-66-27-5
Arguello F.
Andujar P.[4]
7-647-5
Pella G.[2]
Krstin P.
1-66-37-5
Cuevas M.
Monteiro T.[5]
4-67-57-5
Gimeno Traver D.
Dellien H.[6]
7-57-5
R32
Cuevas M.
Taberner C.
7-677-65
Giustino L.
Bellucci T.
6-36-3
Cachin P.
Londero J.[8]
5-76-16-2
Andreozzi G.[3]
Galarza J.
1-67-56-3
Sousa P.
Clezar G.
6-16-2
Lorenzi P.[7]
Coria F.
3-66-07-62
Berlocq C.
Bagnis F.
6-26-0
Arguello F.
De Greef A.
5-76-36-3
Andujar P.[4]
Domingues J.
6-06-3
Monteiro T.[5]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-27-5
Kuzmanov D.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-24-66-2
Krstin P.
Gaio F.
7-657-5
Pella G.[2]
Cid R.
6-46-1
Vilella Martinez M.
Cuevas P.[1]
6-26-2
Dellien H.[6]
Llanes F.
6-26-3
Gimeno Traver D.
Elias G.
6-46-1