Sidharth Rawat vs Zsombor Piros — Shenzhen CH Qualifying Round 2

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Sidharth Rawat
IND
Sidharth Rawat
#530ATP
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 October 2018
hard
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
Rawat S.
7-5 7-5
Piros Z.
Rawat S.
772
Piros Z.
550

Sidharth Rawat defeated Zsombor Piros 7-5 7-5 in the Shenzhen CH qualifying round 2 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rawat S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Piros Z.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rawat S.

Serve advantage — Piros Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rawat S.Piros Z.
1st serve in·Even
56%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.7
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rawat S.Piros Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
57
Break points saved·Dominant
17
84
Break points won·Dominant
6
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
3
85
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
24
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rawat S.Piros Z.
Freshness·
—
54

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q3
Rola B.[3]
Quinzi G.[6]
6-36-4
Napolitano S.[1]
Vavassori A.
3-66-26-3
Moriya H.[8]
Majchrzak K.[4]
6-47-5
Kubler J.[2]
Tokuda R.
6-17-63
Myneni S.[3]
Rawat S.
6-33-67-65
Nagal S.[2]
Kadhe A.[6]
6-47-64
Mukund S.
Shyla Y.
6-47-5
Oliveira G.[1]
Xia H.
6-26-1
Q2
Napolitano S.[1]
Bai Y.
7-607-5
Vavassori A.
Cui J.
6-16-2
Majchrzak K.[4]
Kim C.
6-46-2
Tokuda R.
Takahashi Y.[5]
6-725-2
Moriya H.[8]
Gao X.
6-46-4
Quinzi G.[6]
Chung Y.
7-693-67-5
Rola B.[3]
Podzus M.
7-57-64
Kadhe A.[6]
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
7-616-4
Xia H.
Zhu M.
6-36-3
Myneni S.[3]
Sultanov K.
7-56-2
Shyla Y.
Nam J.[5]
7-662-66-3
Mukund S.
Sabanov M.
6-37-5
Rawat S.
Piros Z.
7-57-5
Nagal S.[2]
Gao X.
6-46-2
Oliveira G.[1]
Sun F.
7-637-5
Q1
Kubler J.[2]
Xia Z.
6-16-1
Napolitano S.[1]
Rungkat C.
6-26-2
Moriya H.[8]
Li Y.
7-54-66-4
Vavassori A.
Weissborn T.
7-636-3
Gao X.
Elgin M.
6-36-4
Cui J.
Banes M.[7]
4-65-1
Kim C.
Granollers G.
4-66-37-5
Majchrzak K.[4]
Wang R.
6-01-0
Quinzi G.[6]
Te R.
7-667-5
Chung Y.
Wang C.
6-12-1
Podzus M.
Slobodchikov R.
6-46-3
Rola B.[3]
Pellegrino A.
7-56-2
Takahashi Y.[5]
Grills J.
6-44-66-2
Tokuda R.
Matsui T.
6-26-3
Bai Y.
He Y.
6-36-4
Gao X.
Pavlioutchenkov A.
6-16-2
Xia H.
Betov S.[8]
7-675-76-1
Sultanov K.
Niesten M.
6-16-2
Myneni S.[3]
Kunsuwan N.
6-47-5
Nam J.[5]
Li Y.
6-46-1
Oliveira G.[1]
He Y.
6-06-3
Sabanov M.
Karimov J.
2-64-0
Mukund S.
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
6-7137-636-4
Zhu M.
Sabanov I.
6-47-64
Shyla Y.
Lo C.
7-654-66-3
Piros Z.
Kim C.[7]
6-16-3
Rawat S.
Li J.
6-36-3
Kadhe A.[6]
Elgin M.
7-611-1
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
Zeng S.
6-26-4
Nagal S.[2]
Liu H.
6-26-0
Sun F.
Balaji N.
6-36-4