Ramkumar Ramanathan vs Sumit Nagal — Shenzhen CH Round of 32

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ramkumar Ramanathan
IND3
Ramkumar Ramanathan
#1338ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 October 2018
hard
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
Ramanathan R.
3-6 6-4 7-6
Nagal S.
Ramanathan R.
36772
Nagal S.
64621

Ramkumar Ramanathan defeated Sumit Nagal 3-6 6-4 7-6 in the Shenzhen CH round of 32 on hard. Ramkumar Ramanathan extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2013-12-30ChennaiQ1hardRamkumar Ramanathan6-2 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Ramanathan R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ramanathan R.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramanathan R.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.1
1.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramanathan R.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
6
33
Break points saved·Even
67
69
Break points won·Dominant
1
35
Deciding sets·Even
19
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
0
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ramanathan R.Nagal S.
Freshness·Even
97
96

Ramanathan R.: 9 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Ivashka I.[7]
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Kavcic B.
6-22-66-3
Semi-finals
Zhang Z.
Hurkacz H.
7-6112-66-2
Ivashka I.[7]
Ito T.
6-36-2
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Nedovyesov A.
7-56-4
Kavcic B.
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Ito T.
Zopp J.[8]
6-36-4
Zhang Z.
Galovic V.
6-46-766-3
Ivashka I.[7]
Caruso S.
6-36-3
Hurkacz H.
Jaziri M.[1]
6-717-56-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Mukund S.
6-46-2
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Safwat M.
1-66-37-64
Kavcic B.
Valkusz M.
6-20-0
Nedovyesov A.
Zhang Z.
7-637-64
R16
Ito T.
Ignatik U.
1-66-36-4
Zopp J.[8]
Li Z.
7-50-67-5
Zhang Z.
Otte O.[6]
6-17-5
Galovic V.
Kecmanovic M.
6-16-2
Jaziri M.[1]
Lee D.
6-26-2
Hurkacz H.
Maden Y.[5]
6-36-4
Ivashka I.[7]
Moraing M.
5-0
Caruso S.
Moriya H.
6-33-66-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Yang T.
6-716-46-2
Mukund S.
Peliwo F.[8]
6-45-76-3
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Gaio F.
4-67-56-2
Nedovyesov A.
Sugita Y.[6]
7-646-4
Zhang Z.
Broady L.
6-41-66-1
Valkusz M.
Fabbiano T.[2]
7-657-5
Safwat M.
Ramanathan R.[3]
7-636-4
Kavcic B.
Tatlot J.
6-16-2
R32
Zopp J.[8]
Bolt A.
2-67-56-4
Caruso S.
Soeda G.
6-44-66-4
Moraing M.
Kwon S.
6-06-3
Ivashka I.[7]
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Ignatik U.
Kavcic B.[3]
7-633-66-3
Ito T.
Wu D.
7-655-77-5
Otte O.[6]
Zhang Z.
6-36-0
Galovic V.
Kubler J.
3-67-56-3
Kecmanovic M.
Granollers M.[4]
6-36-4
Maden Y.[5]
Rola B.
6-26-3
Hurkacz H.
Sonego L.
6-747-646-3
Jaziri M.[1]
Milojevic N.
7-51-67-5
Zhang Z.
Munar J.
3-66-46-2
Li Z.
Vatutin A.
6-26-3
Lee D.
Jung J.
4-67-56-4
Moriya H.
Thompson J.[2]
4-66-26-3
Tatlot J.
Myneni S.
6-00-0
Gaio F.
Lee D.
6-13-0
Kavcic B.
Soeda G.[7]
6-36-3
Valkusz M.
Li Z.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.[3]
Nagal S.
3-66-47-62
Broady L.
Wu D.
6-46-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Gunneswaran P.[4]
6-36-4
Nedovyesov A.
Oliveira G.
6-37-62
Peliwo F.[8]
Te R.
6-37-64
Zhang Z.
Albot R.[1]
6-44-66-2
Safwat M.
Mu T.
6-16-3
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Coppejans K.
6-46-3
Yang T.
Kwon S.
7-56-3
Mukund S.
Wu Y.
7-646-2
Fabbiano T.[2]
Xia Z.
6-36-2
Sugita Y.[6]
Schnur B.
6-36-2