Sasi Kumar Mukund vs Yibing Wu — Shenzhen CH Round of 32

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
IND
Sasi Kumar Mukund
1306ELO
1281Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 October 2018
hard
Yibing Wu
CHN
Yibing Wu
#106ATP
1743ELO
1741Hard ELO
$472kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWLLW
Mukund S.
7-6 6-2
Wu Y.
Mukund S.
7762
Wu Y.
6420

Sasi Kumar Mukund defeated Yibing Wu 7-6 6-2 in the Shenzhen CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Yibing Wu came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mukund S.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Wu Y.

Wu Y.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mukund S.

Serve advantage — Wu Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mukund S.Wu Y.
—
Serve
28
—
Return
29

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mukund S.Wu Y.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
54%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mukund S.Wu Y.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
82
Break points saved·Dominant
20
94
Break points won·Dominant
5
57
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
97
Tiebreaks·Dominant
56
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Mukund S.Wu Y.
Freshness·
—
67

Wu Y.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Ivashka I.[7]
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Kavcic B.
6-22-66-3
Semi-finals
Zhang Z.
Hurkacz H.
7-6112-66-2
Ivashka I.[7]
Ito T.
6-36-2
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Nedovyesov A.
7-56-4
Kavcic B.
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Ito T.
Zopp J.[8]
6-36-4
Zhang Z.
Galovic V.
6-46-766-3
Ivashka I.[7]
Caruso S.
6-36-3
Hurkacz H.
Jaziri M.[1]
6-717-56-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Mukund S.
6-46-2
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Safwat M.
1-66-37-64
Kavcic B.
Valkusz M.
6-20-0
Nedovyesov A.
Zhang Z.
7-637-64
R16
Ito T.
Ignatik U.
1-66-36-4
Zopp J.[8]
Li Z.
7-50-67-5
Zhang Z.
Otte O.[6]
6-17-5
Galovic V.
Kecmanovic M.
6-16-2
Jaziri M.[1]
Lee D.
6-26-2
Hurkacz H.
Maden Y.[5]
6-36-4
Ivashka I.[7]
Moraing M.
5-0
Caruso S.
Moriya H.
6-33-66-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Yang T.
6-716-46-2
Mukund S.
Peliwo F.[8]
6-45-76-3
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Gaio F.
4-67-56-2
Nedovyesov A.
Sugita Y.[6]
7-646-4
Zhang Z.
Broady L.
6-41-66-1
Valkusz M.
Fabbiano T.[2]
7-657-5
Safwat M.
Ramanathan R.[3]
7-636-4
Kavcic B.
Tatlot J.
6-16-2
R32
Zopp J.[8]
Bolt A.
2-67-56-4
Caruso S.
Soeda G.
6-44-66-4
Moraing M.
Kwon S.
6-06-3
Ivashka I.[7]
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Ignatik U.
Kavcic B.[3]
7-633-66-3
Ito T.
Wu D.
7-655-77-5
Otte O.[6]
Zhang Z.
6-36-0
Galovic V.
Kubler J.
3-67-56-3
Kecmanovic M.
Granollers M.[4]
6-36-4
Maden Y.[5]
Rola B.
6-26-3
Hurkacz H.
Sonego L.
6-747-646-3
Jaziri M.[1]
Milojevic N.
7-51-67-5
Zhang Z.
Munar J.
3-66-46-2
Li Z.
Vatutin A.
6-26-3
Lee D.
Jung J.
4-67-56-4
Moriya H.
Thompson J.[2]
4-66-26-3
Tatlot J.
Myneni S.
6-00-0
Gaio F.
Lee D.
6-13-0
Kavcic B.
Soeda G.[7]
6-36-3
Valkusz M.
Li Z.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.[3]
Nagal S.
3-66-47-62
Broady L.
Wu D.
6-46-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Gunneswaran P.[4]
6-36-4
Nedovyesov A.
Oliveira G.
6-37-62
Peliwo F.[8]
Te R.
6-37-64
Zhang Z.
Albot R.[1]
6-44-66-2
Safwat M.
Mu T.
6-16-3
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Coppejans K.
6-46-3
Yang T.
Kwon S.
7-56-3
Mukund S.
Wu Y.
7-646-2
Fabbiano T.[2]
Xia Z.
6-36-2
Sugita Y.[6]
Schnur B.
6-36-2