Tung Lin Wu vs Maverick Banes — Canberra CH Round of 32

Canberra CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 October 2018
hard
AUS
Maverick Banes
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLW
Wu T.
6-4 6-4
Banes M.
Wu T.
662
Banes M.
440

Tung Lin Wu defeated Maverick Banes 6-4 6-4 in the Canberra CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Maverick Banes came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Banes M.

Banes M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Banes M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
55%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Banes M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
10
16
Break points saved·Dominant
84
41
Break points won·Dominant
6
42
Deciding sets·Clear edge
6
18
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Banes M.
Freshness·
80
—

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Seppi A.[7]
Fucsovics M.[6]
5-76-46-3
Thompson J.[3]
Kuhn N.
6-15-76-4
Semi-finals
Seppi A.[7]
Estrella V.[5]
6-26-2
Fucsovics M.[6]
Janvier M.
6-34-66-2
Thompson J.[3]
Janvier M.
6-47-5
Kuhn N.
Nishioka Y.[2]
7-616-4
Quarter-finals
Estrella V.[5]
Mayer F.[2]
7-640-66-3
Fucsovics M.[6]
Grenier H.
6-46-4
Janvier M.
Benchetrit E.
6-46-2
Seppi A.[7]
Garcia Lopez G.[3]
6-36-4
Nishioka Y.[2]
Watanuki Y.[7]
6-36-2
Janvier M.
Grills J.
7-656-4
Thompson J.[3]
Ellis B.
6-36-1
Kuhn N.
Santillan A.
6-42-0
R16
Benchetrit E.
Beale J.
5-76-36-4
Grenier H.
Harris A.
7-53-67-63
Mayer F.[2]
Mitchell B.
6-47-66
Fucsovics M.[6]
Li Z.
6-16-2
Garcia Lopez G.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-4
Seppi A.[7]
Pasha N.
6-26-4
Estrella V.[5]
Puetz T.
W/O
Janvier M.
Jarry N.
6-22-67-65
Ellis B.
Saville L.
7-646-727-65
Santillan A.
Duckworth J.
6-44-66-3
Kuhn N.
Purcell M.
6-26-4
Thompson J.[3]
Statham J.
6-27-63
Janvier M.
Wu T.
6-797-56-3
Nishioka Y.[2]
Hassan B.
6-46-3
Watanuki Y.[7]
Harris A.
7-656-716-0
Grills J.
Doumbia S.
7-663-66-3
R32
Fucsovics M.[6]
Jaziri M.
6-25-1
Seppi A.[7]
Marterer M.
3-66-37-67
Garcia Lopez G.[3]
Bangoura S.
6-36-4
Janvier M.
Djere L.[8]
3-67-56-2
Li Z.
Bourchier H.
6-26-4
Harris A.
Van Peperzeel G.
6-26-1
Pasha N.
Fancutt T.
6-42-67-62
Puetz T.
Kwon S.
5-77-616-4
Mitchell B.
Propoggia D.
3-66-36-1
Blancaneaux G.
Crnokrak A.
6-16-2
Mayer F.[2]
Watanuki Y.
5-76-16-4
Estrella V.[5]
Saville L.
6-36-3
Benchetrit E.
Kicker N.
6-47-5
Jarry N.
Moutet C.
7-646-3
Grenier H.
Sela D.[1]
7-666-1
Beale J.
Kukushkin M.[4]
7-620-0
Harris A.
Mousley B.
7-634-64-0
Statham J.
Mertens Y.
6-36-727-5
Nishioka Y.[2]
Fanselow S.
6-36-2
Grills J.
Moriya H.[6]
4-66-46-1
Santillan A.
Petrone A.
5-77-646-1
Wu T.
Banes M.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.
Polmans M.[5]
7-644-67-63
Purcell M.
Bolt A.[4]
6-16-736-4
Thompson J.[3]
Beale J.
6-26-2
Kuhn N.
Vilardo F.
6-16-3
Watanuki Y.[7]
Reboul F.
7-656-1
Hassan B.
Lock B.
6-17-5
Ellis B.
Uchiyama Y.[8]
7-696-3
Saville L.
Vukic A.
6-36-3
Doumbia S.
Fancutt T.
4-66-46-2
Janvier M.
Klein B.
6-46-3