Emil Ruusuvuori vs Zsombor Piros — Liuzhou CH Qualifying Round 2

Liuzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
FIN5
Emil Ruusuvuori
#787ATP
1606ELO
1577Hard ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 October 2018
hard
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
Ruusuvuori E.
6-3 6-1
Piros Z.
Ruusuvuori E.
662
Piros Z.
310

Emil Ruusuvuori defeated Zsombor Piros 6-3 6-1 in the Liuzhou CH qualifying round 2 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruusuvuori E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Piros Z.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ruusuvuori E.Piros Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruusuvuori E.Piros Z.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
72
57
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
84
Break points won·Clear edge
48
32
Deciding sets·Slight edge
80
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ruusuvuori E.Piros Z.
Freshness·
—
54

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q3
Nagal S.[4]
Kadhe A.[7]
6-46-4
Tokuda R.[3]
Mo Y.
6-26-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[1]
Sabanov M.
6-26-3
Chung Y.[2]
Ruusuvuori E.[5]
6-36-3
Q2
Kadhe A.[7]
Mukund S.
6-16-2
Nagal S.[4]
Sultanov K.
6-46-4
Mo Y.
Zeng S.
3-66-47-61
Tokuda R.[3]
Karimov J.
6-17-64
Ruusuvuori E.[5]
Piros Z.
6-36-1
Chung Y.[2]
Hossam Y.
7-56-3
Sabanov M.
He Y.
6-37-610
Davidovich Fokina A.[1]
Zhu M.
6-46-2
Q1
Karimov J.
Cui J.
6-36-4
Ruusuvuori E.[5]
Betov S.
6-26-3
Kadhe A.[7]
Tanuma R.
7-646-2
Mukund S.
Liu H.
6-36-2
Nagal S.[4]
Xia Z.
6-26-2
Zeng S.
Kim C.[8]
6-46-4
Mo Y.
Wang R.
6-46-2
Hossam Y.
Lo C.
7-643-66-2
Chung Y.[2]
Rawat S.
5-76-26-3
He Y.
Nam J.[6]
2-66-36-2
Zhu M.
Gao X.
1-66-36-1
Davidovich Fokina A.[1]
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-26-2
Sabanov M.
Hua R.
6-36-4
Piros Z.
Niesten M.
6-756-47-65
Tokuda R.[3]
Takahashi Y.
7-56-0