Miomir Kecmanovic vs Brayden Schnur — Liuzhou CH Round of 16

Liuzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Miomir Kecmanovic
SRB6
Miomir Kecmanovic
#59ATP
1768ELO
1709Hard ELO
$756kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 October 2018
hard
CAN
Brayden Schnur
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLW
Kecmanovic M.
6-4 7-6
Schnur B.
Kecmanovic M.
6772
Schnur B.
4650

Miomir Kecmanovic defeated Brayden Schnur 6-4 7-6 in the Liuzhou CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kecmanovic M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Schnur B.

Schnur B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kecmanovic M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Kecmanovic M.Schnur B.
34
Serve
—
45
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kecmanovic M.Schnur B.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.6
7.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kecmanovic M.Schnur B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
68
27
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
86
Break points won·Dominant
67
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
60
14
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
69
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kecmanovic M.Schnur B.
Freshness·
82
—

Kecmanovic M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Albot R.[1]
Kecmanovic M.[6]
6-24-66-3
Semi-finals
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Kavcic B.
3-66-36-4
Albot R.[1]
Gunneswaran P.[7]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Albot R.[1]
Wu D.
6-03-66-3
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Fabbiano T.[3]
6-756-16-3
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Li Z.
7-674-66-3
Kavcic B.
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-632-66-1
R16
Wu D.
Ito T.[8]
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.[3]
Zhang Z.
6-46-1
Davidovich Fokina A.
Valkusz M.
6-26-1
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Schnur B.
6-47-65
Li Z.
Sugita Y.[4]
6-46-4
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Safwat M.
6-46-4
Albot R.[1]
Lee D.
6-27-5
Kavcic B.
Martinez P.[5]
6-36-4
R32
Kavcic B.
Coppejans K.
6-36-2
Martinez P.[5]
Wu Y.
7-56-2
Albot R.[1]
Te R.
7-677-61
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Chung Y.
6-11-0
Zhang Z.
Sun F.
6-46-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Ramanathan R.[2]
7-636-3
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Tatlot J.
6-47-5
Fabbiano T.[3]
Gaio F.
6-766-16-2
Schnur B.
Broady L.
6-25-76-3
Safwat M.
Soeda G.
3-66-36-4
Wu D.
Nedovyesov A.
7-627-63
Li Z.
Oliveira G.
1-67-666-4
Ito T.[8]
Nagal S.
6-26-3
Lee D.
Yang T.
6-26-3
Valkusz M.
Peliwo F.
2-66-26-2
Sugita Y.[4]
Tokuda R.
6-27-5