Miomir Kecmanovic vs Zhe Li — Liuzhou CH Quarter-final

Liuzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Miomir Kecmanovic
SRB6
Miomir Kecmanovic
#50ATP
1768ELO
1709Hard ELO
$756kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 October 2018
hard
CHN
Zhe Li
#1964ATP
39 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWW
Kecmanovic M.
7-6 4-6 6-3
Li Z.
Kecmanovic M.
79462
Li Z.
67631

Miomir Kecmanovic defeated Zhe Li 7-6 4-6 6-3 in the Liuzhou CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Miomir Kecmanovic came in ranked #50.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kecmanovic M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Li Z.

Li Z.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kecmanovic M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Kecmanovic M.Li Z.
34
Serve
—
45
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kecmanovic M.Li Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 155). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kecmanovic M.Li Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
23
Break points saved·Dominant
98
58
Break points won·Dominant
67
18
Deciding sets·Clear edge
56
44
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kecmanovic M.Li Z.
Freshness·
95
—

Kecmanovic M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Albot R.[1]
Kecmanovic M.[6]
6-24-66-3
Semi-finals
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Kavcic B.
3-66-36-4
Albot R.[1]
Gunneswaran P.[7]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Albot R.[1]
Wu D.
6-03-66-3
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Fabbiano T.[3]
6-756-16-3
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Li Z.
7-674-66-3
Kavcic B.
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-632-66-1
R16
Wu D.
Ito T.[8]
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.[3]
Zhang Z.
6-46-1
Davidovich Fokina A.
Valkusz M.
6-26-1
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Schnur B.
6-47-65
Li Z.
Sugita Y.[4]
6-46-4
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Safwat M.
6-46-4
Albot R.[1]
Lee D.
6-27-5
Kavcic B.
Martinez P.[5]
6-36-4
R32
Kavcic B.
Coppejans K.
6-36-2
Martinez P.[5]
Wu Y.
7-56-2
Albot R.[1]
Te R.
7-677-61
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Chung Y.
6-11-0
Zhang Z.
Sun F.
6-46-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Ramanathan R.[2]
7-636-3
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Tatlot J.
6-47-5
Fabbiano T.[3]
Gaio F.
6-766-16-2
Schnur B.
Broady L.
6-25-76-3
Safwat M.
Soeda G.
3-66-36-4
Wu D.
Nedovyesov A.
7-627-63
Li Z.
Oliveira G.
1-67-666-4
Ito T.[8]
Nagal S.
6-26-3
Lee D.
Yang T.
6-26-3
Valkusz M.
Peliwo F.
2-66-26-2
Sugita Y.[4]
Tokuda R.
6-27-5