Jason Jung vs Roberto Ortega Olmedo — Las Vegas CH Round of 16

Las Vegas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jason Jung
TPE4
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 October 2018
hard
ESP
Roberto Ortega Olmedo
35 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLLL
Jung J.
6-4 6-4
Ortega Olmedo R.
Jung J.
662
Ortega Olmedo R.
440

Jason Jung defeated Roberto Ortega Olmedo 6-4 6-4 in the Las Vegas CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Roberto Ortega Olmedo came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Jung edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jung J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ortega Olmedo R.

Ortega Olmedo R.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Serve advantage — Jung J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jung J.Ortega Olmedo R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 144). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jung J.Ortega Olmedo R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
21
0
Break points saved·Dominant
64
19
Break points won·Even
8
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
21
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Jung J.Ortega Olmedo R.
Freshness·
78
—

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kokkinakis T.
Rola B.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Kokkinakis T.
Ruud C.[3]
6-46-1
Rola B.
Smith J.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Smith J.
Jung J.[4]
7-636-3
Ruud C.[3]
Majchrzak K.
7-57-5
Kokkinakis T.
King D.
6-16-4
Rola B.
Bourgue M.
6-47-61
R16
Bourgue M.
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
6-40-66-3
Rola B.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-36-4
Ruud C.[3]
King E.
6-36-2
Kokkinakis T.
Harris L.[1]
6-46-3
Jung J.[4]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-46-4
Smith J.
Ilkel C.
6-36-1
Majchrzak K.
Arevalo M.[8]
2-66-16-4
King D.
Paul T.
6-46-4
R32
Ortega Olmedo R.
Choinski J.
6-36-4
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
Wolf J.
6-36-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Song E.
6-46-4
Rola B.
Rubin N.[5]
6-31-66-3
Arevalo M.[8]
Aragone J.
6-24-67-63
King E.
Robredo T.
6-36-4
Ruud C.[3]
Krueger M.
6-33-66-3
King D.
Koepfer D.[7]
6-46-4
Paul T.
King K.
6-17-62
Harris L.[1]
Ward J.
6-46-4
Jung J.[4]
Sarkissian A.
7-656-4
Kokkinakis T.
Cozbinov A.
7-656-1
Majchrzak K.
Kozlov S.
6-06-2
Bourgue M.
Serdarusic N.
7-646-4
Smith J.
Sels J.
6-747-56-4
Ilkel C.
Torpegaard M.
6-43-67-66