James Ward vs Quentin Halys — Ismaning CH Round of 32

Ismaning CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
James Ward
39 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 October 2018
hard
Quentin Halys
FRA7
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Ward J.
6-7 6-3 7-6
Halys Q.
Ward J.
666772
Halys Q.
783631

James Ward defeated Quentin Halys 6-7 6-3 7-6 in the Ismaning CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ward J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Ward J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ward J.Halys Q.
—
Serve
39
—
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ward J.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Even
67%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.6
11.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (115 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ward J.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
29
57
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
97
Break points won·Even
6
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
75
Tiebreaks·Dominant
39
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ward J.Halys Q.
Freshness·
—
93

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Baldi F.
Sakharov G.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Sakharov G.
Haerteis J.
6-46-2
Baldi F.
Humbert U.[2]
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Sakharov G.
Jahn J.
6-33-66-3
Humbert U.[2]
Viola M.
6-16-2
Baldi F.
Krawietz K.
4-66-26-4
Haerteis J.
Masur D.
7-56-3
R16
Baldi F.
Bonzi B.
7-642-67-64
Krawietz K.
Barrere G.[6]
5-77-57-64
Sakharov G.
Travaglia S.[4]
3-66-46-4
Haerteis J.
Klein L.
6-34-67-5
Masur D.
Cachin P.
6-26-2
Humbert U.[2]
Seraphim C.
6-36-4
Jahn J.
Wessels L.
7-656-4
Viola M.
Ward J.
7-51-67-63
R32
Seraphim C.
Mager G.
7-657-65
Humbert U.[2]
Lamasine T.
7-616-3
Ward J.
Halys Q.[7]
6-766-37-63
Wessels L.
Miedler L.[8]
7-6106-3
Haerteis J.
Novak D.[5]
0-67-657-5
Masur D.
Zapata Miralles B.
7-666-3
Cachin P.
Sonego L.[1]
5-76-46-4
Barrere G.[6]
Lemstra K.
7-656-3
Krawietz K.
Grigelis L.
6-47-64
Travaglia S.[4]
Brkic T.
7-56-3
Bonzi B.
Heyman C.
7-54-66-4
Viola M.
Safranek V.
6-46-2
Baldi F.
Trungelliti M.[3]
6-36-4
Klein L.
Erler A.
6-36-4
Sakharov G.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-36-1
Jahn J.
Brown D.
6-11-0