Federico Gaio vs Kimmer Coppejans — Ningbo CH Round of 32

Ningbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 October 2018
hard
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1469Hard ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWLWLLW
Gaio F.
6-3 2-6 6-4
Coppejans K.
Gaio F.
6262
Coppejans K.
3641

Federico Gaio defeated Kimmer Coppejans 6-3 2-6 6-4 in the Ningbo CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Kimmer Coppejans came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Federico Gaio claimed a first win over Kimmer Coppejans in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Federico Gaio closed it out in three sets, 6–3 2–6 6–4.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-01-20Australian OpenQ1hardKimmer Coppejans7-6(4) 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Gaio F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Coppejans K.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Serve advantage — Coppejans K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaio F.Coppejans K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaio F.Coppejans K.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
20
44
Break points saved·Slight edge
76
67
Break points won·Dominant
3
29
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gaio F.Coppejans K.
Freshness·
—
76

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Fabbiano T.[3]
Gunneswaran P.[7]
7-644-66-3
Semi-finals
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Kecmanovic M.[5]
6-26-2
Fabbiano T.[3]
Albot R.[2]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Chung Y.
6-26-1
Fabbiano T.[3]
Gaio F.
1-66-46-4
Albot R.[2]
Ito T.[8]
7-56-4
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Durasovic V.
6-26-4
R16
Ito T.[8]
Te R.
6-46-4
Fabbiano T.[3]
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Gaio F.
Soeda G.
6-47-67
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Li Z.
6-32-67-60
Kecmanovic M.[5]
Davidovich Fokina A.
4-66-36-4
Durasovic V.
Hurkacz H.[1]
7-646-4
Albot R.[2]
Tokuda R.
6-47-63
Chung Y.
Watanuki Y.
2-67-656-3
R32
Fabbiano T.[3]
Nagal S.
4-66-46-2
Li Z.
Oliveira G.
4-67-656-3
Te R.
Zhang Z.
6-16-2
Moriya H.
Wu D.
6-46-4
Gaio F.
Coppejans K.
6-32-66-4
Watanuki Y.
Broady L.
6-27-5
Kecmanovic M.[5]
He Y.
6-16-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Yang T.
6-37-5
Ito T.[8]
Takahashi Y.
7-636-3
Chung Y.
Ramanathan R.[4]
1-67-677-62
Albot R.[2]
Sun F.
6-46-3
Durasovic V.
Wu Y.
6-47-5
Tokuda R.
Myneni S.
6-36-2
Hurkacz H.[1]
Xia Z.
6-37-63
Gunneswaran P.[7]
Safwat M.
7-676-2
Soeda G.
Lopez Perez E.[6]
7-693-67-67